User talk:Bobadillag/Archaeology of the Philippines

I like that you started with the archeology following the Philippines independence as it provides information that is authentically Philippine rather than under Spanish or American influence. I would like to see more of what you've already begun working on excited to see where it goes!

Peer Review (pt 2) Seems like a good work in progress and addition to the article; very informative and relevant. The lack of reference to your source is the only critique I have. Putting a citation at the end of info from that source or after every sentence with concrete information in it seems more appropriate. Otherwise, looks really good and I'm excited to see it added in. :) Lperkins5825 (talk) 03:26, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Gabrielle, I think you have some good ideas here. I agree that the introduction could be extended, as it is right now it contains almost no information, and the bulk of the article is just a bullet-list of notable finds. So there is substantial room for a more in-depth overview, and I think you're right to focus your attention on the post-independence period. In addition to highlighting prominent Filipino archaeologists and anthropologists in that section, you might also include a bit more information about some of their most important works too, and perhaps that would provide space for you to add additional citations. But fine start here! MP Bwana Msitu (talk) 03:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Response to Peer Reviews Thank you to everyone who looked over my draft. I did forget to add my citation at the end of the information I added in the post-independent section. I do agree that providing information of the works/findings from these famous anthropologists would make the section look better and will give me more sources to cite (if not already cited). Thank you again!Bobadillag (talk) 15:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)