User talk:Bobbiebackdraft

Welcome
Hello, Bobbiebackdraft, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --   Luke      (Talk)   20:41, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Vic Ruggiero accusation
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Vic Ruggiero, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your edits are accusatory and unsourced and therefore, not acceptable on Wikipedia. Additions such as these should have a properly cited source and be noteworthy. So far, neither condition has been met, no matter how mnay times you attempt to add it. NJZombie (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

there was no accusation. it is all fact from the New Brunswick, NJ courthouse.

Once again, factual or not, it doesn't belong on wikipedia unless you can provide a source and properly cite it. If you can't do that, it doesn't stay in the article. Those are the rules. Refer to WP:ALIVE for more information. NJZombie (talk) 23:41, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

No problem, i have researched how to cite legal cases and the next post will be cited with all information including dates, judges etc.

That may not be enough. Refer to Misuse of primary sources concerning the use of legal documents. If you do manage to add it, do not place it in the introduction. It should have its own section. If placed improperly, it will absolutely get deleted again by another editor. Your passion for adding this makes it seem personal and if it comes across that you are connected to this incident or it doesn't come across as neutral, that will also wind up being grounds for removal. Just some things to keep in mind. NJZombie (talk) 00:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I've removed the addition again because there was no citation of a secondary source. If it's worth mentioning in the Wikipedia article, there will be a newspaper article or the like to cite as a source. —C.Fred (talk) 00:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)