User talk:BobbyThomsonPrinters

Welcome!
Hello, BobbyThomsonPrinters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Stonehaven derailment did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:00, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

My edits were absolute fact, maybe more research is required by those who change things back. This is one of the reasons that Wiki so often fails. The sources used in this case are of no quality. BobbyThomsonPrinters (talk) 01:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Stonehaven derailment; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

What’s the point, I don’t believe I am right. I know I am right. Don’t let facts get in the way. BobbyThomsonPrinters (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)