User talk:Bobby Jacobs

Thank you, Bobby Jacobs, for reviewing the article on mathematician Doug Ulmer and for removing the banner template. Welcome to Wikipedia!
Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 05:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks for the barnstar! Bobby Jacobs (talk) 17:28, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Revision of article on mathematician Douglas Ulmer
Thanks, Bobby Jacobs, for your contributions about prime numbers to Wikipedia articles. You may want to look at the revised article on Douglas Ulmer. There are now some links to his scholarly articles which may interest you.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Your RfA
I have removed your RfA. You are way too inexperienced to become an administrator.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * This may be discouraging (trust me - I know how it feels), but I will say that Bbb23 did you a favor by deleting this RFA. As you expand your knowledge and experience on Wikipedia and become fully proficient with the project as a whole, you'll understand why :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Unblock
What motivated you to use CheckUser? How did you know that I had a sock puppet? What about my RFA caused you to believe that I had another account? Bobby Jacobs (talk) 12:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

A bad year for websites
I used to contribute to OEIS, as Charles Greathouse knows. Then, I got blocked on OEIS. Then, I contributed to Wikipedia. Now, I am blocked on Wikipedia. This has been a bad year for websites! Bobby Jacobs (talk) 11:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Unblock
This has been a hard year online for me because I was blocked on OEIS this year, too. User:CRGreathouse can confirm this. He helped me get back on OEIS. Now, I would like to get back on Wikipedia. Bobby Jacobs (talk) 15:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) I know that I was blocked for having more than one account.
 * 2) I promise not to use another account.
 * 3) I have made useful contributions, and I will continue to do so.

A number listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A number. Since you had some involvement with the A number redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question)  03:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
What would you edit if unblocked? CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Math articles. Bobby Jacobs (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 431 (number) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 431 (number) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/431 (number) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Nerd1a4i (they/them) (talk) 18:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)