User talk:Bobby Southside

Please be sure to sign your posts while adding a new discussion. Feel free to ask or discuss anything whatsoever.

November 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

There is a difference between posting "witty things" and clearly false information- unless you are a Martian professional wrestler who believes in alien rights. Now that you know such material is not acceptable, what constructive contributions do you want to make to this project? 331dot (talk) 17:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Sir, please try to understand. I don't want to expose my private life in public. User pages for me are intended make people aware of the user's character. Like i have saw many users using userboxes which even contains messages like "This user doesn't give a f***" and etc. These too are false info but are intended to make the audience laugh and nothing at all. I would after adding the infobox add userboxes with no such content . This act isn't that big to be awarded a block as many other users have made their talk pages like this. I know the policies too and would never try to harm them intentionally. RegardsBobby Southside (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * At the end, i just want to say that please give me a chance to prove that i can edit productively on wikipedia. I can not have any edit history in just 3 hours. Please give it a second thought, sir. I have good knowledge about football, rock music, Indian laws etc. Please unblock so i can prove my worth.Bobby Southside (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You are free to make another unblock request, which another administrator will review. 331dot (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Why are you all being so critical of a user who has yet not known fully about wikipedia. I said that i have understood the reason and i won't do that again, so why? In guide to appealing blocks, it was said that you should say this so i have said and thats enough. What you guys need from me in order to unblock me. I have never saw any user being indefinitely blocked for such a small thing and even after he apologized and gave proper reasons for his editing.

I once again say that please unblock me, i will never do that again.Bobby Southside (talk) 11:30, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You have been told by me and Yamla what you need to do to get unblocked(demonstrate that you understand WP:NOT and tell exactly what contributions you want to make). If you make another request, it will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot (talk) 11:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh my goodness. This is horrific what is going on here. I don't need to tell you thousand times, isnt it? It feels like you both haven't read my whole unblock reason otherwise you would have surely got your answer. I said that i have great knowledge about football association, rock music, Indian law and many more. Also i even told you the two problems i was liable for and also justified that none of them could be actually used to show me a criminal(as i am treated here). I know that its not compulsory for a user to have user pages but every user has his aspiration(why you both have made user pages if it means nothing). I want to be a master editor like you all and a master editor always has a well managed user page. I still standby that i have not done any wrong and if you would have given me some time i would soon have started to edit other pages. I know it fully that wikipedia isnt social networking site and im not a fan of social networking sites too. Im just here to contribute to my user page which is my property and articles which are wikipedia's property. Nobody shall decide what should be in my property unless it causes problems to other. Im not being offensive but im a little provoked here as my appeals are not even being considered fully. I have said many times that how can you judge that i was not here to contribute to wikipedia but just for myself considering only 3 hours of editorial history. Im sorry if it hurts you both. But really, not only i but no newcomer deserves this kind of treatment when it has been said by wikipedia policies too that try to make the user understand his mistakes and not make him flee away. No warnings, No time but only an indefinite block was what was given me. This seems to be an exceptional case. Bobby Southside (talk) 12:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It is certainly not true that "a master editor always has a well managed user page". Many users have been here for years and even over a decade and have no user page at all.  While you have a degree of control over what appears on your user page, it is not "your property" and is subject to Wikipedia policies.  You saying "Im just here to contribute to my user page" is why you are blocked and will remain so until you do what you have been asked to do.  You don't have to be a "master editor" to contribute, but you do need to show what contributions you want to make(personal knowledge is not sufficient).  If you are going to make another unblock request that will be reviewed by someone else, please do so; if it is not productive, or you post another long comment, your ability to edit this page may be removed. 331dot (talk) 12:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It seems that you won't try to undsrstand what i want to say. So just stay away from this user page for sometime. Im again doing an unblock request and i don't need any interference.

I suggest WP:CIR and WP:IDHT applies here and talk page access should be revoked by the next reviewing admin. --Yamla (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2018 (UTC) This is a straight forward personal attack on me by him. And no disruptive editing is here. And the WP:CIR never applies here as i am fully aware of english and moreover the message above is a complete witness of that. I have knowledges about syntax too and thats why i had made an infobox well. WP:IDHT too can't be applied here. I haven't disrupted anything. I have just add some unblock request. Now for them, making an unblock request is disruptive because they don't want the user to ever get justice. Moreover, some peoples have broke the wikipedia laws by consistently trying to provoke a new editor by deleting his user page, then blocking him without any warning. Wikipedia policy states that no editor should haunt other users away and also that blocking should be done after negligence to Warning which in my case wasn't even provided. I doubt if the peoples who seem to be on a war against me are the only one who used to edit using that account cuz considering there no. of edits they should have proper knowledge about Wikipedia Policies which the case doesn't seems to be. Bobby Southside (talk) 13:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Your latest unblock request is almost identical to the previous one. That plus your attack on have resulted in my revocation of your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * This is now a CheckUser block.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)