User talk:Bobbytheonlyone

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Edit summaries
Hi Bebbytheonlyone! Please try to use edit summaries in your edits so that other Wikipedians can better understand the nature of your edits and/or the reasoning behind them. Cheers and good luck! -- Ynhockey (Talk) 12:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

St Peter's
Please don't remove material without good reason and without leaving an edit summary.

You removed a clause about the fact that the pope was warned that the death of a previous pope was an "omen". Let me make it clear:

Regardless of whether the omen was true, regardless of whether the pope believed in omens, regardless of whether omens are a superstition, the fact is that people around the pope warned him that the death of his predecessor was an "omen".

The "warning" and the pope's failure to heed the warning are the events that took place, and were highly significant at the time. There was (naturally) a very strong opposition to pulling down Old St Peter's.

Amandajm (talk) 02:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Icarus
Hello! I've removed what appears to be your uncited or personal comparison of the Icarus myth with the Hindu myth of Jatayu and Sampati, in the Ramayana. Please, don't restore it unless you can justify it. You can do this by citing reliable scholarly sources in the field of comparative mythology. If they make the comparison, fair enough. If not, it's original research, which is not allowed. Please check all this at the editing links given in your welcome message, above. Oh, and if you do find appropriate citation for the deleted material, please consider how best to integrate it within the article. It doesn't belong under the heading "Classical tradition". Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 09:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, Bobbytheonlyone, let me also welcome you to the Icarus article. I see that Haploidavey has said precisely what I came to say, but you may discuss this if you wish at Talk:Icarus. Cynwolfe (talk) 11:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Masturbation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 05:25, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Economy of India. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SBC-YPR (talk) 15:46, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Types of silk
I started editing some of the notes you added to the article on silk when I realised that you have just copied the wording of these notes from the website you gave as a reference. This is not allowed under Wikipedia policy except for short quotes which are clearly marked as quotes as this breeches copyright law. I am sure you made these additions in good faith, and they do contain a lot of interesting information but, for copyright reasons, I will remove them now. However, as there is so much good information here, I would be very grateful if you could rewrite the material yourself and then add it again to the article. Many thanks, John Hill (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Raavan. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -  Managerarc   ™ talk  20:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Adnan Sami. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 19:07, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for September 7,2011 Delhi High Court Blasts
An article that you have been involved in editing,  September 7,2011 Delhi High Court Blasts, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Adhir Kirtikar - Everything is Possible... The Impossible just takes longer... (talk) 09:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

May 2012
Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article The Mousetrap. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 15:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  David_FLXD  (Talk) 19:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 10:09, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samsung Galaxy S Duos concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Samsung Galaxy S Duos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deputy Collector, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public Service Commission ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Deputy_Collector check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Deputy_Collector?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Suniel.jpeg.jpg


The file File:Suniel.jpeg.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)