User talk:Bobfelicce82

Misrepresenting sources
Just to notify you of the obvious: Blatantly misrepresenting sources, as you did in these edits, is not acceptable. "[...] which would have made PowaTag one of the worlds most important technologies in mobile payments"? Here's what Business Insider really had to say: "However, even if the deal was real, it's by no means certain that Powa would have been a success in China." That's just one example. Continuing this kind of conduct will see you blocked from editing. Huon (talk) 23:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Bobfelicce82. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Fences &amp;  Windows  17:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Randykitty (talk) 17:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
SmartSE (talk) 13:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)