User talk:Bobfordsgun

Welcome, fellow video game enthusiast!

 * }

Suggested WikiProjects
If editing articles on video games interests you, consider joining the Video games WikiProject and/or one or more of these platform specific projects: WikiProject Xbox, WikiProject PlayStation and/or the Nintendo task force. Cheers, He's Gone Mental 13:25, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Skyrim nuisance, AKA Tesseract501
I suggest leaving him alone, he hasn't made a single edit to a mainspace article. From looking at his contributions it is clear that he has only complained about things in articles. I'm going to stop commenting on his 'suggestions' and it would keep us both sane if everyone ignored him.He's Gone Mental 15:32, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

In writing, each mention should have a point.
Concerning your edit in Skyrim plot section here:

Ysgramor informs the player that Alduin has placed a "soul snare" in Sovngarde, allowing him to gain strength by devouring the souls of deceased Nords arriving there. The player meets up with the three heroes of Nordic legend who defeated Alduin originally, and, with their help, destroys the soul snare, confronts Alduin in Sovngarde and destroys him.

-

I see that you removed that information I added about the main character destroying the soul snare. I don't particularly mind that. I understand that it will make things concise and make the sentence more readable, but the information was there not as wp:fancruft but to justify the mention of Sovngarde. Allow me to ensure you that I know something about serious professional writing. And in writing, especially in a summary or synopsis (or even in a novel), each mention should have a point.

If, in a synopsis, you describe a tree standing there in a scene, and there's no mention of anything else consequential to that tree, then there's no point of mentioning it. (Synopsis keeps only important things. And if the tree's just there, why is it worth mentioning? Is it fancruft? Is it there because the contributor likes how cool it is? OR will it be important later on?) If that tree will yield a fruit that will drop onto someone's head and causes his death later, you might wish to mention that tree, because it matters later. Same goes for the soul snare. Ysgramor just mentioned it, and most readers, who don't play Skyrim, might ask why this is important, because there's no evident reason mentioned in the article. They definitely won't know how cool the soul snare is. It's just there, then does nothing. But if you mentioned that it needs to be destroyed later. Then that information about soul snare has a point of being there. I added the information because I didn't want to cut anyone else's information. And because, naturally to wikipedia, people will provide tons of excuses to prevent what they added from being deleted. Well, I do have a reason, but it's there because I know how to write professionally. My job requires it. If you really wish to delete that the soul snare is destroyed in order to to force Alduin to show up, Ysgramor's mention of the soul snare has no reason to be there either, since it's inconsequential. Anthonydraco (talk) 04:01, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

MOSCAPS
Hi Bobfordsgun,

Thanks for your edits on Skyrim. I do have to ask you to keep WP:MOSCAPS in mind: the word 'content' isn't written with a capital letter :) Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 10:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones / GG-J's Talk
Good evening Bobfordsgun,

I have replied to you latest posting here. Cheers, -- Gareth Griffith-Jones / GG-J's Talk 20:42, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Godfather & True Grit
Hello Bob, Just in case you are not watching. And this. All the best! -- Gareth Griffith-Jones / The Welsh Buzzard 19:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey Gareth, thanks for maintaining my edits. I wouldn't have considered it overlinking either, just adding some links to fill out the content more, haha. Bobfordsgun (talk) 12:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad to help a like-minded pal. Cheers!  -- Gareth Griffith-Jones / The Welsh Buzzard 15:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim - Dragonborn, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ash, PC and Refuge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spyglass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Iwan Rheon
I have undone your edits to several Game of Thrones episode pages because Iwan Rheon's character is listed as "boy". While it is very likely he is in fact Ramsay Snow, it has not been revealed on the series yet, so it is speculation. Furthermore, if the character's true identity were to become known in the coming episodes, the name would not change on the previous episode pages, because at that time, the character was still "boy". Thanks. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 20:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!