User talk:Bobfreshwater

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Merging UCHSC with University of Colorado Denver
Sounds like a good idea to me! Your edits and photos look great. Denverjeffrey (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

GA Nomination of University of Colorado Denver
Reviewer --  Nascar 1996 

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

You will have to add it to all the appropriate topic. Thank You.  Nascar 1996  00:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

90% certainty
Hi Bob. IPCC AR4 says on one page that it is "very likely" humans are the main cause of GW. They use this and other expressions of certainty throughout the document, and provided a definition. We cite the page where they say it is "very likely" humans are the cause, and also a page with a summary of their definitions. In case you did not read those 4 refs at the end of the sentence, very likely is defined as being >90% certain based on a combination of statistical analysis combined with expert judgment. Maybe there is a "more scientific" way to communicate certainty, and maybe you know what it is. However, we are limited to what appears in the reliable sources, and IPCC's every-7-years climate science assessment reports have substantial weight. If you have alternative ways to talk about this in the article, with sources, please post your thoughts to the talk page. Have a happy, NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)