User talk:BobiSwiftie

November 2012
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Miranda Lambert because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Red Tour, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Widr (talk) 10:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Red (Taylor Swift album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Widr (talk) 10:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Take Me Home (One Direction album), you may be blocked from editing. Mjs1991 (talk) 09:24, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Billboard 200
Please stop adding unsourced Taylor Swift cruft to articles not pertaining to her. Specific sales achievements she has belong in her artist page or her discography, and always should have a source. Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Billboard 200. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 14:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note also that Twitter is not considered a reliable source. Please read that policy for further information.  Thanks. - eo (talk) 14:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at I Knew You Were Trouble, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing, adding unsourced content not verified by sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Your contributed article, List of Taylor Swift Songs


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of Taylor Swift Songs. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Taylor Swift. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Taylor Swift – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cindy ( talk to me ) 07:09, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, List of Taylor Swift Songs, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. ''Please do not attempt to create new articles by copying text from one article to another. We have both the Taylor Swift article, as well as the Taylor Swift discography and as such, the content copied to List of Taylor Swift Songs is wholly inappropriate.'' Cindy  ( talk to me ) 07:21, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Cindamuse. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Taylor Swift because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Following is a link to the disruptive edit: . Cindy  ( talk to me ) 07:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Red (Taylor Swift album). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Stop adding spam websites like ATRL.net — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 05:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shenandoah Aluarte


A tag has been placed on Shenandoah Aluarte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. FrankDev (talk) 10:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of artists who reached number one in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 12:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at I Knew You Were Trouble. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Widr (talk) 05:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Swift, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Widr (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red (Taylor Swift album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahhhh


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ahhhh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 13:47, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 13:50, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at I Knew You Were Trouble, you may be blocked from editing. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 15:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello
You seem to be accidentally blanking parts of articles when you are making edits, can you please not do that? You also appear to be adding material without citing your sources, be aware that on wikipedia we have a no original research policy. When you write something, you also have to write it in your own words, you can't copy and paste from a source, that is considered a copyright violation and plagiarism.

There is currently a discussion at this noticeboard: Administrators' noticeboard for Incidents which you should take part in. IRWolfie- (talk) 15:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Note that the discussion about your edits at ANI is ongoing, and that editors have recommended that you be blocked from editing. You will want to go to the Administrators' noticeboard for Incidents and discuss this issue. As per the warning below, and as per ANI, if you continue to add material to articles without adequate sources, You may be blocked from editing. Thank you. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:39, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Begin Again (Taylor Swift song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Luke no 94 (tell Luke off here) 11:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

A Message From Taylor Swift
Taylor Swift once said:

'''“No matter what happens in life, be good to people. Being good to people is a wonderful legacy to leave behind.” ― Taylor Swift'''

BobiSwiftie, you are not being good to people. See Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If you don't straighten up and stop your disruptive behavior, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please, be the kind of fan that Taylor would be proud of. Start by replying to this message and discussing what you are doing wrong and how you can do it better. Seriously. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Blocked April 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for repeated disruptive editing, as per below. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

With some regret, I have blocked your account. You have been warned repeatedly not to post unsourced material, and did not respond to those warnings. Worse, you appear to have posted material directly from Taylor Swift's website, which is both a violation of copyright and of neutrality (material from the subject herself is not usable). The problem edit is here. Had you found the reviews and cited them each to their original source, you might be ok - though it would be undue weight to not also include negative reviews, if any. You've been warned, repeatedly, and have made no response - thus, the block. Please take time to review our policies before editing further. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page I Knew You Were Trouble has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 11:06, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   Thank you.  Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 11:22, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to add unsourced information to articles after multiple warnings and having been blocked several times for the same thing already. This is an indefinite block, but not necessarily infinite - you can be unblocked if you give us a convincing commitment to adjust your behaviour. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:42, 19 April 2013 (UTC)