User talk:Bobibob5

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bobibob5/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Bobibob5/sandbox
User:Bobibob5/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bobibob5/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Bobibob5/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bobibob5/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The article on the band has already been accepted. Please stop resubmitting the same article.  We don't need two identical articles on one band.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of I Expect Nothing and I'm Still Let Down


A tag has been placed on I Expect Nothing and I'm Still Let Down requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 04:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Passing Time


A tag has been placed on Passing Time requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 07:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Formatting
Hi. I noticed some things wrong on your created article, Stories of the Year (EP) so I'll list off the things you should fix in the future.


 * Do not use "th" in dates, for example: "October 30th". Omit that.
 * Do not italicize song titles. Just put them in quotation marks.
 * Do not use colons in the Personnel section.
 * You misspelled the Personnel section as "Personnal".

Please see WP:MOSALBUM for more album formatting guidelines. thanks. --Jennica ✿ / talk 00:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Jennica for those information.

Proposed deletion of Move On To Honest Things


The article Move On To Honest Things has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica ✿ / talk 01:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stories of the Year (EP)
Hello Bobibob5,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Stories of the Year (EP) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 13:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Passing Time
Hello, Bobibob5,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Passing Time should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Passing Time.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 11:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC) Oh I see,. You created this nonsense; I should have checked and replaced the speedy. Incidentally it is not done to remove speedy deletion tags from your own articles.TheLongTone (talk) 11:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)·

Deletion discussion about Stories of the Year (EP)
Hello, Bobibob5,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Stories of the Year (EP) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Stories of the Year (EP).

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 11:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Stories of the Year (EP), you may be blocked from editing. I'm giving you a level 3 warning as you have removed several AfD notices. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC)