User talk:Bobjones1984

Welcome!
Hello, Bobjones1984, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Takashi Uesugi, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! –Ammarpad (talk) 06:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Ken Joseph Jr


The article Ken Joseph Jr has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. RA 0808 talkcontribs 20:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ken Joseph Jr
Hello, Bobjones1984. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ken Joseph Jr, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ken Joseph Jr to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

XyzSpaniel Talk Page  21:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, I'm ImprovedWikiImprovment. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mitsuo Fuchida without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  IWI  ( chat ) 09:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Further to the above, it is very difficult to assume that you are acting in good faith when you use misleading edit summaries like this (and many others apparent in your history). If you persist in doing so, you will be blocked. Please do not hesitate to ask me if you have any questions about this. Steve Smith (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * And probably indefinitely. I see multiple edits - some very large, that you claimed were grammar or typos. Do it again and I see you doing it and I'll block you. Doug Weller  talk 13:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice for post-1932 American politics and living or recently deceased people
Doug Weller talk 13:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Guy (help!) 12:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Note that indefinitely does not mean forever. It does, however, mean that you need to start engaging with the Wikipedia community to address the concerns noted above, which continue on your edits today. Note to reviewing admins: an unblock with an AP2 topic ban would probably be OK. Guy (help!) 12:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

I've unblocked you but
you need to follow the topic ban carefully - read what it  means - and you need to start writing appropriate edit summaries or you will be blocked again. Doug Weller talk 13:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Guy (help!) 22:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

- repeat of the same edit warring, same article, within the TBAN scope, no edit summary, still no engagement with the community at all. I suggest we leave blocked pending engagement. Guy (help!) 22:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)