User talk:Bobkennedy1234

Welcome!
Hello, Bobkennedy1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

There is no promotional material added. I have just added more information on those development tools which makes more sense and provide a good understanding based on the information provided on their actual sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobkennedy1234 (talk • contribs) 12:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The reasons these edits aren't appropriate are that the sites you've linked to are not WP:RELIABLE sources, the content isn't notable, and we're WP:NOTHOWTO. Thanks, and please read our guidelines. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * And yes, content like The editor is super-fast and facilitates quick editing of files of all sizes. It even offers code completion for Android XML and Java. The developer can avail Android online help right from the code, smart expand selection, pinch zoom, keyboard support, and more. is overtly promotional in tone. I'm also wondering if it was copied from somewhere. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Information provided for both the development tools are from their owner sites which are very reputed in nature. Not sure why do you think those aren't appropriate / notable sources. Infact I have also collated information on other tools that are available in that group as well which I was going to update. But then the current informational update was just rejected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobkennedy1234 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Again, I encourage you to read our guidelines, including those for which I've provided links. Two editors have explained that the sources aren't acceptable and the content is promotional. As a side note, I'll ask again whether any of it has been copied. Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 12:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Nothing is copied. Let me try if I can change the promotional tone of the information so that it becomes acceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobkennedy1234 (talk • contribs) 13:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * No matter how you "change the promotional tone" (which would eliminate most of the content you added), unless you can provide independent, reliable sources which explain why this information is notable for inclusion in this article it is not going to be acceptable, See WP:RS for an explanation of what sources would be considered reliable. The sources need to be independent from the product(s) for obvious reasons. I suggest that you propose any such content and sources for discussion on the article talk page rather than just re-adding it. Thanks. -- Begoon 01:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png in the enhanced toolbar, or Signature icon.png if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Begoon 01:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)