User talk:Bobo hobo 777

December 2014
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Christopher Lee because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beavis and but thread


A tag has been placed on Beavis and but thread requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Crow  Caw 19:27, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe the dick


A tag has been placed on Joe the dick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sjö (talk) 19:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of I am a murderer
Hello Bobo hobo 777,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged I am a murderer for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. LouiseS1979 (talk) 19:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm Lstanley1979. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! LouiseS1979 (talk) 19:47, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your garbage has now been deleted. Do not add more inappropriate content, or you may be blocked from editing. jni (delete)...just not interested 19:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2010s. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2010s was changed by Bobo hobo 777 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959778 on 2014-12-27T19:52:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cold War II, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cold War II was changed by Bobo hobo 777 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959682 on 2014-12-27T19:55:40+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:55, 27 December 2014 (UTC)