User talk:Bobuck survey

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. CardinalDan (talk) 02:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2 2008
Sorry. My edits aren't showing up in the text box. On it.

This version is a substantial addition to the article with emphasis upon current nomenclature of the two species involved, T. caninus and T. cunninghami, as there appears to be some uncertainty associated with their designation. Hence the matter needs to be covered in a Wiki article.

The original material I have retained and incorporated into the Description, Diet & Reproduction sections. I have made some minor alterations to the wording of the original text with a view to, hopefully, improving its style. I also excised some unnecessary duplications. For example: philopatry is defined elsewhere in Wiki and linked to from this article. Its meaning therefore should not be reiterated in the text.

Southern Bobuck images will soon be uploaded to Wiki Commons.

Bobuck_survey