User talk:Bobvans1487

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 13:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nick Fuentes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 13:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 13:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Fuentes. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 07:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC) writing that various groups claim that Nick holds certain views is not soapboxing. Please refrain from acting in bad faith

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Nick Fuentes. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 07:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Turning Point USA, you may be blocked from editing. ''this edit where you labelled it an Israeli organisation instead of American. '' Doug Weller  talk 12:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia.  Thepenguin9 (talk''') 18:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * In order to remain objective, you need to stick to the facts. Trivial reversals meant to either idolize or demonize him just shows that you’re acting in bad faith. Please refrain from having bias, your objectivity is seriously lacking.
 * “In an interview with The Hill, Fuentes insisted that he is not racist, anti-Semitic or a white nationalist. Fuentes said he believes that the Holocaust did take place and that the "cookies" bit was said for shock value.“ Bobvans1487 (talk) 18:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The reversals are not trivial. You are introducing bias into the article and continuing to do so may result in a block. Reversals are meant to be taken as a "try again" if they are not constructive.  Thepenguin9 (talk''') 19:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)