User talk:Boccadasse

August 2018
Hello, I'm Seraphim System. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Turkey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Your edits have restored unsourced or improperly sourced content to the article. Please be more careful in the future. All content needs to be supported by reliable, secondary sources.''  Seraphim System  ( talk ) 13:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 * My references are mostly books published by "Oxford University Press" and "Cambridge University Press", and "Encyclopaedia Britannica". If you can find any better references (I doubt it) please add them. Otherwise, stop deleting my content. Boccadasse (talk) 14:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Turkey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Seraphim System ( talk ) 14:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Is this your method of trying to justify your mass deletion of the content and references that I added (which are mostly books published by "Oxford University Press" and "Cambridge University Press", and "Encyclopaedia Britannica")? If you can find any better references (I doubt it) please add them. Otherwise, stop deleting my content. Boccadasse (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Edit warring at Turkey
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Turkey. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Seraphim System  ( talk ) 11:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Seriously, you need some help... Boccadasse (talk) 11:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
 * Hello Boccadasse. The edit warring report was made here. It seems to me that you are continuing the fight at Turkey for which you were previously blocked. I hope you are not feeling optimistic for the future, since this behavior is likely to get you blocked for a longer time. You might avoid further sanction if you will reply and promise to make no more edits at Turkey unless you get prior consensus for your changes on the article talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Block
Since you didn't get the point after your last block, you are now blocked again, this time indefinitely. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. If you are unwilling to work with others, you will not be allowed to edit here. You may contest or appeal this block by adding the text to this talk page. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)