User talk:Bodhi83

Your edits to Krusty and Batfink
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo 05:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:NPOV
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding only one limited portion of information from the source, as you did to Bobby Rush, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom  00:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Adding information about Mr. Rush (a public official) that he tries to keep silent from others. It is hardly biased and nothing but the truth.

Bodhi83 (talk) 19:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Adding one-sided information designed to smear an individual is, within wikipedia, a violation of our policies. If you do not wish to edit within wikipedias guidelines, then you should consider making your opinions known elsewhere. -- The Red Pen of Doom  20:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

That is completely absurd. I am not attempting to smear anyone. His past is a matter of public record, and he is a public servant. That you are attempting to cover up his criminal and negligent past is biased. All that I am simply adding is information that is public knowledge.

So, let me ask you a question? How is this not pertinent to his biography, ESPECIALLY since it is properly sourced? Bodhi83 (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Bobby Rush
Please stop your POV editing of the Bobby Rush article. Continued violation of our WP:NPOV and WP:BLP policies will result in you being blocked from editing. -- The Red Pen of Doom  20:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Please explain to me how adding information that is true is a violation of this policy? You're fighting to protect someone (a public figure) from having a FACT posted about them. Bodhi83 (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)