User talk:Bogdan247

Speedy deletion nomination of TeleType Co., Inc.


A tag has been placed on TeleType Co., Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of TeleType Co., Inc. and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 22:02, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I unfortunately had to delete the article. But it might well be possible to write a satisfactory one on the company: You need to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases  You also need to write like an encyclopedia article, not a catalog. Describe the key products in a sentence or two, and add some reference to show that they are widely used or well-known. And see  our guide to writing Wikipedia articles. Good luck with it. I'm sorry this had to be your first experience here--but if it turns out that you cannot find material for an article, perhaps you can improve some of our many inadequate articles on technical subjects and notable companies.  DGG ( talk ) 02:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Bogdan247, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Bogdan247/DraftTeleType. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks WikiDan
Hi Dan, thank you for the help on the references. I was planning to clean them up myself, and in the future I will be careful to follow the standards. Thanks again. Regards, Bogdan

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo-agilitek.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo-agilitek.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 15:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
In general, a person or organization added to a list, as on Filipino Canadian, should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability policy. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 01:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of John Estrella for deletion
The article John Estrella is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Estrella until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  PK T (alk)  22:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Maria Estrella for deletion
The article Maria Estrella is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maria Estrella until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  PK T (alk)  23:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Re: Notability and deletion discussions
Hello Bogdan. Just responding to your note at the John Estrella Afd. You have done a good job of collecting and formatting sources for the article, but they are all primary sources. They prove his membership in organisations and positions at companies, but do not indicate notability. The article needs sources written by orgs. he is not a member of to meet the guideline (i.e. "secondary sources"). It's a somewhat difficult concept, but read WP:PSTS to get an idea. I noticed that the Agilitek article suffers from the same problem, so some work may have to be done there to avoid deletion. Have a good day, and if you have any questions, ask away. The Interior (Talk) 00:05, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-agilitek.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo-agilitek.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Your user page User:Bogdan247/DraftTeleType, by reason of its contents, was mistakenly included in a content category. It has been corrected for you. For information about this, please see the guidelines about the categorization of user pages. Thank you. -DePiep (talk) 23:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)