User talk:Bogdangiusca/Archive17

Hey Bogdan:
Would you like to help me with the Thracian language article? I'm about to expand it. I need help weeding out non-cognates that random editors placed over the past few years, also help tracking down more attestations of the Thracian lexical items. 76.208.169.188 (talk) 18:51, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The article lack any references for the list of words. That table ought to have for each word the source of the word (what ancient author or a reference to the epigraphic source) and a reference for each proposed PIE etymology. I'll try to do some cleanup. bogdan (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Ok, please be careful with your adjustments, there is a section there for ==Attestations==. A number of the alleged cognates are wrong, added by random probably Slavic-speaking users (however most of the Slavic cognates look to be correct). Also someone seems to have removed a Romanian cognate that you had placed a year or two ago. 76.208.169.188 (talk) 19:12, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * If I don't get to soon expanding that section where Thraco-Phrygian is discussed, here is some info about why "Thraco-Phrygian" is no longer a major theory, see that Paleolexicon website given as an external link in Thracian language: three major points 1) Phrygian was mostly Centum, very marginally satemized; 2) Phrygian was very close to Greek, Thracian doesn't seem to have been so close to Greek, aside from maybe some southern Thracian language groups. 3) Phrygian anthroponyms etc. do not support Thraco-Phrygian. This is not to say that a study of Phrygian would not turn up many close cognates with Thracian, but that's not enough to support Thraco-Phrygian. 76.208.169.188 (talk) 05:15, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * By the way, when Bogdan says, "That table ought to have for each word the source of the word (what ancient author or a reference to the epigraphic source) and a reference for each proposed PIE etymology"---Yes I agree with Bogdan there and that's how I want the article to be, and I contacted Bogdan to help me get the article like that. When I was adding the PIE roots, I noted "after Pokorny", "after Olteanu", etc., and even there more specific references were needed, however I wanted to fill in the table, and if I were to have waited till I had all the references, the table would have been bare for years. With that said, all of the PIE etymologies currently shown are from the Thracological literature, but from who and from what publication exactly, I don't have that info now. 76.208.166.185 (talk) 06:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Inochentism
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Pseudoscience
Care to explain your revert, or do you common wikipedia editors just assume you can do what you want? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barwick (talk • contribs) 17:45, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 100 greatest Romanians


The article 100 greatest Romanians has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, possibly copyvio. cf. Articles for deletion/200 Greatest Israelis. List articles that simply reproduce lists published elsewhere are non-notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:50, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 100 greatest Romanians for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 100 greatest Romanians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/100 greatest Romanians (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Adding to the nom's above notice, I should point out that I quoted you at the indicated AfD. Especially in the event that your view may have changed, you may wish to see what my quote reflected.  Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

To the be the best
I wa wondering (or, after a while, me and Biruitorul were wondering) if you would be interested in helping us accomplish something that, for me in any case, is uncharacteristically patriotic: an all-Romanian, all-WWI, Did You Know queue on December 1. We've got two articles set aside already, I for one have got some more in the making, and the more the better: maybe we end up with two queues... but I'm getting ahead of myself here. Anyway, it would be great to have you in as the third contributor, provided you want, have the time to, and are inspired by the topic. I guess this is sort of an open invitation, "should you want to accept it". Dahn (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I like the idea, so count me in. I'm thinking of writing an article about Romania during the Central Powers occupation and maybe I can find some other topic. :) bogdan (talk) 19:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I was thinking of that as well, but my concern is that it would be redundant to the existing Romania in World War I. I mean, between that and the treaties (two in Bucharest, one in Brest, one in Paris...), the events (battle upon battle, union of... with..., war of... with...), the concepts (Greater Romania, Old Kingdom, National Council of..., Directory Council of..., Rumcherod), we'd be having a plethora of articles on the same short time span: 1917-1919. I don't want to suggest that we couldn't do it in the way you suggest, but maybe it is more manageable if we center it on (and this is sizzling stuff) the Romanian administration of occupied Romania. Administration of occupied Romania (1917–1918), Government of occupied Romania (1917–1918) or similar would be, I believe, more focused, and could in any case be saying a lot about what the occupiers themselves were doing; plus it's a place to link all the parallel references to "Minister of..." in articles such as Alexandru Tzigara-Samurcaş. It could also tackle the fact that toward the end even legitimate Romania recognized the administration - it had to, I guess, but it's just one of those gems... In my view, it could fill the big hole at the middle of Romania in World War I without creating the redundant overlap.
 * But whatever you chose of the two is fine, and I'll be there to consolidate. As per our good old tradition :). Dahn (talk) 01:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Where would cultural aspects fit in? This is an essay focusing on Romanian culture during the war, both before 1916, during the occupation and under the Iasi government. Unfortunately, we can't see all of it, and I'm not sure where else we could find material on the subject (the author says it's largely neglected), but there's a Polish culture during World War II, so maybe. - Biruitorul Talk 14:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, believe me, there are sources, to count just my usual suspects (Cernat, Călinescu, Boia, Vianu Sr., Vianu Jr., Crohmălniceanu, Gârbea, Cioculescu, Cioroianu, Tismăneanu, Veiga, Pârvulescu, Stanomir, Ornea, Babeţi & Ungureanu, Neumann all tackle the subject in various ways); I also have worthy prefaces to Rebreanu, Fundoianu, Vinea, Topîrceanu, Cezar Petrescu, and Ilincioiu's study to Doctrina ţărănistă. That's the literary, social and philosophical side mainly. But then we have the visual arts stuff, where I can mainly rely on Grigorescu, but I also have some monographs on some of the main names to remember (Verona, Tonitza) and we can easily get more on some of the others who add to the chorus (say, Paciurea or this guy). Nothing I have can replace Maria Bucur as the source on popular culture, alas - except perhaps a pinch of Boia here and there, and, provided we can leaf through and get the relevant bit, something in the precious Neubauer-Cornis series.
 * The issue with synthetic articles is not about writing them, it's about finishing them and then spraying the links around in all relevant articles. It's of the Symbolist movement category, if we do it right; if not... I mean, Polish culture during World War II has improved a lot (the article, I mean, not the subject!), but it still looks like trivia has been thrown in there. Dahn (talk) 21:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
 * At which point I realize I haven't replied to your most stringent question: whether or not we end up creating a separate article, I find that the basic overview on culture belongs most likely at the end of Romania in World War I - which is now so militarily-focused that it is illegible.
 * A note of my own, for when/if we get a look into this: we are likely to find ourselves ignoring this aspect, but note how the period has had an indirect impact on Romanian cinema, from Ciulei (may God rest our Orson Welles) to this (the lady' right - it's quite good) and, obviously, this (the epilogue, I mean). Dahn (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Btw, Bogdan, can you help me with this? I seem to have botched up the vectorizing (again!), and there's plenty of gaps in my understanding of how it works: for instance, why the font I chose, which was closer to the model, never made it on the commons copy. If you want to redo it from scratch and upload over it, I wouldn't mind the least; in fact, you'd be helping me hide my shame :). Dahn (talk) 10:02, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Btw, gentlemen, could I point out that DYK is also for 5X expanded articles? There are some categories of potential adoptees... Dahn (talk) 10:24, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Paleo-Balkan Languages
Hi!

I stumbled upon the article on paleo-balkan languages which you started a long time ago. While your intention seems to have been good, it has somehow gone out of hand by now. I started a discussion and wanted you to know if you like to have a word in the discussion.Amilah (talk) 20:47, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The term is used by linguistics not as a subgroup of the IE languages, but rather as a geographical grouping of the languages, which, with the exception of Greek, we know very little other than the fact they were IE. The article doesn't say anywhere that they were in fact a family. There are some sources about the topic, so it's possible to add more references. bogdan (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Aram Alnashéa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aram Alnashéa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aram Alnashéa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 07:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Kazakhstan in Popular Culture listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kazakhstan in Popular Culture. Since you had some involvement with the Kazakhstan in Popular Culture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Cambalachero (talk) 14:00, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
You may wish to participate to the discussion. We need sources for the table Codrin.B (talk) 22:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Romania
--Codrin.B (talk) 03:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Eugène Ionesco
Hi. You may be interested in my query there. Rothorpe (talk) 21:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear Bogdaniusca,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk)23:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Census 2011
They don't seem to link this file from anywhere, so you may be interested in the full preliminary data for Tulcea:. Anonimu (talk) 20:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. bogdan (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. When you recently edited Obște, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dacian and Vrancea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Nicolae Timofti
We dont add original research or crytal ball (and that to without sources) as you did on his page and the president of moldova page. please cite the source.(Lihaas (talk) 10:24, 16 March 2012 (UTC)).
 * You are readding unsourced and unexplained maerial to a BLP that is unnaccapteable. Please do onot do that again.(Lihaas (talk) 11:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)).

Gorikovo
Bless you. Dahn (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * But having said that, you're not going to vanish again? We really missed you, man. Dahn (talk) 22:10, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll try not to vanish this time. :) bogdan (talk) 17:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Never heard of it... Dahn (talk) 05:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Hunnic Empire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hunnic Empire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hunnic Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bulwersator (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Sasa Pana by Victor Brauner.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sasa Pana by Victor Brauner.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Anittas sockpuppet
I think it's patently clear this is what Madmans stone is, and I would appreciate it if you could intervene before he creates more disruption. - Biruitorul Talk 15:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked. bogdan (talk) 16:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. He's already popped up again. - Biruitorul Talk 14:12, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * sup? --Mimicry0 (talk) 15:57, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * So Bogdan, tell me: how many times have you heard from Bir in the last year? Now, tell me: what was the occasion for his visit to your talkpage? He didn't thank you after you blocked the nickname; he thanked you after I reappeared again. And lastly, tell me: what was the reason he asked you to block that previous nickname, but not the other nicknames mentioned? Oh, it's because he didn't like me calling him out? He didn't like me telling him that he's a phony, and that he shouldn't imply that other people have low IQs? He didn't like the fact that others told him off when he went compaigning? Ok, got it. Now block this nickname and see you on Monday! :) --Mimicry0 (talk) 16:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked :) bogdan (talk) 16:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Iosif Berman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to National Geographic and Caucausus


 * Grigore Preoteasa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Remington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1980s austerity policy in Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consumption (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Censorship in Islam
Category:Censorship in Islam, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:00, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email! If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia). Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
 * 2) Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code.  Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
 * 3) Create your account by entering the requested information.  (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
 * 4) You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID.  (The account is now active for 1 year).
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
 * Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
 * Show off your Questia access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silviu Brucan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Luxury and Gazeta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Dobruja/Wallachia
I've always surmised that at its most basic level, there are three divisions in Romania: Moldavia (including Bukovina), Transylvania (including the Banat, Crisana and Maramures) and Wallachia (including Oltenia and Dobruja). The Church, at any rate, lumps in the latter with Wallachia in the Bucharest Metropolis.

Even if Dobruja is entirely separate from Wallachia, that leaves the question of what to do with Cocoş Monastery (and any other monasteries we may write about in the area), since I would like to put them all in subcategories. One option is to create a new Category:Romanian Orthodox monasteries in Dobruja. The other is to define the Wallachia category as including Dobruja, even if it's not technically in Wallachia. Which would you prefer? - Biruitorul Talk 17:35, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't think I've ever heard of Dobruja being included in Wallachia, so I think it's best to make a separate category. bogdan (talk) 17:58, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Târgoviște, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Night watch and Cellar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicolae Ceaușescu's cult of personality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National holiday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited September 1991 Mineriad, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Law and order and Gendarme (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

troll
Hi, I noticed you blocked a troll. Please check out a similar. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Someone should research into the time it takes to create a new account and compare it to the time it takes to block an account. If it takes less time to create an account than it takes to block one, then the admin who invests his time in blocking the account is investing more energy than the troll, or the instigator, in creating the account. I'm not a mathematician, but I would assume that in order to find out the coefficiency, one would first start by counting the steps it takes to complete the task in question and time it. The formula could look something like this:

c x t = R; where c stads for calories, t stads for time, and r stands for resources. Say, for instance, that it takes me (an instigator and a sock puppet) 3 seconds to create an account. In addition to this, it also takes me 1 calorie to perform the task while I'm sitting down. That would result in a value of 3 (3 x 1 = 3). If we consider that the admin has more tasks to perform, since his operation is more complex, than we can heuristically conclude that the admin is investing more resources. Truth to be told, other values should be taken in the composition. For instance, on a neurological level, the admin can draw more pleasure in exercising his powers (dopamine is released, the amygdala is stimulated), than what the instigator experiences when he is blocked. Well, until he (read: me) returns. Then who knows what sick pleasures he draws for making his reappearance known. Oh, what a sick world we live in! Omg, trolls at every street corner! Damn it, it used to be better in the old days, when surfing the internet for an hour cost you 10 bucks! Back then, the troll would budget his internet time by first writing his instigative post on a word processor, then connect to the internet and quickly paste the text into the forum- or the newsgroup post. With the connection being slower and rather unreliable, one was careful how he wasted his data volume. But I wouldn't be knowing anything about that! I've only been doing this since, err ... 2001. So now I sit starring on my Mac, connected to 4G wireless, and instigate. "But, but," you think, "when we ban you, we also ban your IP." True enough, but as I told Dahn last year, that's pretty useless. Only if you could ban the motherboard would it mean anything (you can't due to regulations that prohibit it). As it is now, you ban this IP, I take my other laptop connected to a 3G; you ban that one, I take out my iPhone; you ban that one (I wonder if you can?), I steal someone's computer. Oh, or I just renew the IP. Lolz!

Anyhow, this isn't the reason why I came to Bogdan's talkpage. The reason I came to Bogdan's talkpage is to ask him for the etymology of "razesti" (Bogdan is some kind of linguist, or was going to be, but fucked up). That don't matter, though. So Bogdan, do you know? I checked Dexonline but couldn't find anything. Thanks in advance, vere! :) --Cei Trei (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Do you mean "răzeși" (as in free middle-class peasants in Moldavia)? the etymology seems to be "részes", which means "partner", "shareholder". bogdan (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Great, I still can't spell and again I make a fool of myself. At least don't tell the guy with a heart of stone. Cheers! --Cei Trei (talk) 22:51, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * One more thing: I am not the troll that Staszek linked to in the this thread (I just checked the link). Although I think you already knew that. :D --Cei Trei (talk) 22:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dissent in Romania under Nicolae Ceaușescu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Romanian perestroika
In case you're interested in writing on the economic reforms (or "reforms") of the late 1960s, this looks like a great starting point. - Biruitorul Talk 15:25, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you, that's interesting and I do intend to write about the reforms. :) bogdan (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Theo Codreanu
Hello, I noticed you proposed the above article for deletion but you did not give a reason why. Could you please amend the prod and supply a reason for deletion. Thank you. Rotten regard 21:42, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Anthology of Modern Romanian Verse - Bilingual Edition (Daniel Ionita, Editura Minerva 2012)
Bogdan,

Multumesc pentru avertismentul de spam. Sunt nou pe wiki, dupa cum ti-ai dat probabil seama. Am adaugat detalii despre Antologia de Poezie Romana Moderna - Editie Bilingva (Daniel Ionita, Editura Minerva 2012) al carei autor sunt, publicata si lansata recent - detalii care au fost sterse. Trebuia intr-adevar sa citesc mai intai regulile. Apriciez oferta de ghidaj, indrumare.

In esenta, iti voi relata pe scurt situatia. Cand vei avea timp si dispozitie, voi aprecia raspunsul tau.

Ca scurta prezentare: Locuiesc de 32 de ani la antipozi (Noua Zeelanda initial, si de 22 de ani in Australia, Sydney). Predau la University of Technology Sydney (Organisational Improvement, Lean Six Sigma - in cadrul Executive Development Unit, Graduate School of Business). Acum... Editura Minerva mi-a publicat recent (Noiembrie 2012) 2, Bilingual Edition, (English/Romanian) lucrare scrisa in colaborare cu Prof.Univ. Daniel Reynaud, si Prof. Eva Foster. Cuprinde poezia romaneasca din 1850 pana in prezent, peste 55 de poeti, si peste 75 de poezii (sincer, nu le-am numarat...). Lucrarea este prefatata de criticul si istoricul literar Alex Stefanescu, si apreciata deja in unele articole ca fiind de referinta pentru reprezentarea poeziei romanesti in limba engleza - lingua franca pe plan mondial, vrem-nu-vrem... Articolele sunt incipiente, fiindca lucrarea de abia s-a publicat, dar semnificative, zic eu. Pot produce evidenta necesara, daca este nevoie.

Intrebarea mea: Care este cea mai acceptabila forma de a referentia lucrarea in wiki? Forma care sa nu incalce regulile de spam, bineinteles, dar in acelas timp sa nici nu ofenseze bunul simt?

Subiectiv vorbind (fiind autorul, iti dai seama cat de obiectiv pot fi...), cand si in ce conditii va putea lucrare sa merite pagina proprie de wiki? Cum se realizeaza acest lucru?

Lucrarea, zic eu, este semnificativa si reprezinta pentru prima data o prezentare coerenta a poeziei romanesti in limba engleza.

Orice sfaturi si indrumari sunt binevenite.

Cu stima Daniel Ionita Sydney, Australia

PS: Ca si idee despre anvergura lansarilor Lansarea volumului (de librarie, ca si in cadrul Targului de carte Gaudeamus) a strans, printre altii, pe: Ion Caramitru, Ilinca Tomoroveanu, criticul literar Alex Stefanescu, Nicu Alifantis, Andrei Paunescu, Marga Labis (sora poetului), numerosi poeti in viata(Daniel Banulescu, Lucian Vasilescu, Adrian Munteanu, Nora Iuga, etc etc. I-am invitat si pe ceilalti, dar cei mai multi nu au raspuns...). Pe 20 Decembrie va avea loc la Biblioteca Nationala in Bucuresti o a 3-a lansare, cu prezenta Redactorului Sef de la Minerva, Ana Munteanu, ca si a actritei si directorului artistic de la Teatrul National Ilinca Tomoroveanu, poeti etc. 21 Decembrie, lansare la Brasov, etc, etc.


 * Salut.
 * Dacă lucrarea conține doar câte o poezie sau două din fiecare poet, nu cred că e ok să fie inclusă în pagina fiecăruia, dar ar putea fi inclusă într-o secțiune de traduceri în engleză la Romanian literature.
 * Pentru a avea un articol propriu, trebuie ca acel articol să fie scris respectându-se Verifiability și Notability. Adică fiecare informație să fie din surse "third-party" și "reliable".
 * Pentru cărți, ca să fie "notable" trebuie să existe mai multe recenzii publicate despre acea carte (în România Literară, sau orice altă publicație de acest gen). bogdan (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Buna Bogdan,
 * In primul rand multumesc pentru indrumari si explicatii. Le voi urma. Iata acum cateva "dovezi", inclusiv receinzie in Romania Literara. Atazez link-ul mai jos din RomLit, apoi articolu (bilingv) in Confulente Romanesti (unde dupa articolul in Romaneste, exista si varianta in limba Engleza). Ca si unul doua alte articole (unul de la Agentia de Carte, etc).
 * Ma voi lasa bineinteles indrumat...

http://www.romlit.ro/farmecul_antologiilor_de_altdat http://confluente.ro/Poezie--Valori/Alex_stefanescu_poezia_data_in_dar_alex_stefanescu_1354232274.html http://www.agentiadecarte.ro/2012/11/%E2%80%9Ctestament-antologie-de-poezie-romana-moderna%E2%80%9D-coordonator-prof-daniel-ionita/ https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.422267321160567.104967.150310491689586&type=1

Ma rog, ar mai fi si altele. Cu stima Daniel Ionita

Disambiguation link notification for December 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Dissent in Romania under Nicolae Ceaușescu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Pluralism


 * Ion Gavrilă Ogoranu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Spiegel


 * Orthodox Church in Communist Romania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to National Salvation Front

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grivița Strike of 1933, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surrender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Do you still do svg images?
I you do, could you perhaps help me? I'm working on the long-awaited article about the original People's Party, and there's two I can think of that would really improve the article. For one, I only approximated the party symbol - on commons, we just don't have a yellow hexagram that would look right. The model could be something like this (I'm not suggesting we should add the portrait in the middle, but, hm, it would be a nice addition...). Also, a map of Greater Romania with Ialomiţa, Teleorman and Vlaşca highlighted would be really cool - it would show what regions the PP got most of its votes from. What say you? Dahn (talk) 14:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Yup, I still do. I'll try to do them. :) bogdan (talk) 18:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)


 * You's a gentleman and a scholar! Dahn (talk) 12:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

translation
Hi, I was wondering if you might be willing to assist in a small translation job. Here is an illustration with Italian labels. Might you translate them into English? – JBarta (talk) 19:11, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

(Pushing my luck)
Kudos on the massive upload of dacoromanica stuff on commons, but please don't forget about the People's Party stuff I asked for. I'm almost done with the article, and it would be really cool if we could synchronize - it would make the article look really neat, and would give us the DYK image to boot. If you can't work on this the moment, it's still okay, I'm willing to wait - but I just want to make sure you did not forget about it. You're one of a handful of guys who can both work with vectors and can identify stuff written in Romanian, so you're essential for this pet project of mine. (It was either you or Andrei Nacu, but he seems not to be very active, and does not appear to be very interested in such modern stuff.)

Think of this as a gentle "bump" on a forum page... Dahn (talk) 14:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I tried something, but it's not really that great. It seems that when exporting to SVG, some things got a bit different, but here it is: Stea Averescu.svg. bogdan (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Well, it is very nice, but something sure did happen to it. As you might remember, I used to get the same errors when I would tackle svgs over here. Do you suppose it's a wiki error? Dahn (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of hoards in Romania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Sheath, Phalera, Stâncești, Phiale and Lupu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Can you assist a new Italian-speaking contributor?
I am looking for an Italian-speaker to help a new contributor. Over at Editor assistance/Requests someone has suggested you might be able to help. What do you think? -- John of Reading (talk) 15:20, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

About the table
I've removed the table in the Satu-Mare article because it was showing fake information from a website that does cite a source but when checking with the source (Varga E. Arpad) the content is actually totally different. I've replaced the table with correct data. I've explained everything here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Satu_Mare#Wrong_demographics_.3F -Paul- (talk) 11:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I've already explained it here. Please stop reverting. Please check my source (actually it's the same source as the one cited for the table) - I used the real, original source. The numbers are totally wrong in the table. I don't know how to place a comment if using the undo function so I can't explain that there.

-Paul- (talk) 11:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

UNIREA face PUTEREA! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cei Trei (talk • contribs) 08:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Kish Mir In Tuchis
Vad ca ai sarit repede in ajutorul tovarasului tau de la SRI, Biruitorul. Te-ai demascat... Sunteti amandoi penibili: va pricepeti la toate si la nimic, cenzurati, dati lectii, sanctiuni... Va credeti destepti nevoie-mare, dumnezeii Wikipedia, dar sunteti ridicoli. Kish Mir In Tuchis! --109.96.191.250 (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Eu sunt de la altă agenție de spionaj, nu la SRI. Restul este corect. bogdan (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Bravo,ai simtul umorului ! Sincere felicitari ! Sper sa nu ma blochezi...:)))--109.96.191.250 (talk) 19:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Vrei sa discutam deschis ? Daca da, iti dau adresa mea email - implicit ma "deconspir" - si iti voi explica totul.--109.96.191.250 (talk) 19:38, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Ilarie Voronca by Robert Delaunay.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Ilarie Voronca by Robert Delaunay.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of members of the Romanian Academy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cristea Mateescu and István Nagy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

List of hoards in Romania
Great job with that list! --Codrin.B (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! :) bogdan (talk) 17:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of sculptures in Herăstrău Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Jean Rey


 * Romanian leu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to National Geographic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Cycling in Bucharest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Colentina


 * Herăstrău Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Tomis


 * Krk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Dalmatian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Defunct organisations of Romania
Category:Defunct organisations of Romania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 10:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Nouseforkings.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Nouseforkings.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Petru Vodă
I'm not quite sure what's going on here, but could I please ask you to restore order after several disruptive moves?


 * Petru II of Moldavia should go back to Petru I of Moldavia
 * Petru III of Moldavia to Petru II of Moldavia
 * Peter IVI Aaron to Peter III Aaron
 * Peter V Rareș to Peter IV Rareș


 * Peter the Lame and Peter the Cossack were also touched by this spree.

The pre-existing chronology is in conformity with our List of rulers of Moldavia, and with this list. Thanks for taking a look. - Biruitorul Talk 18:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I reverted all his changes. He did quite a mess, with the "Peter IVI", copy-and-paste moves and all that... bogdan (talk) 19:03, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Indeed. I checked out ro.wiki and found a different user there performed a similar set of moves about a month ago, starting with Petru I, and apparently based on some research in a 2001 book. (I don't know how widely accepted its findings might be.) Here, the response was some further edits and an angry message. I think I'll stay out of this one, but it could be worth watching. - Biruitorul Talk 23:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Nouseforkings.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Nouseforkings.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Georgia (country) to Georgia move suggestion
Please comment here. Thanks. georgian JORJADZE 18:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1971 Certej dam failure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Certej (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Romanian protests against the Roșia Montană Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antena 3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

2013 Romanian protests against the Roșia Montană Project
Hi, I just want to ask you is that protest part of the Anti-austerity protests in Romania? I am asking you because you added 2013 Romanian protests against the Roșia Montană Project under "Austerity /Benefits in European Union" in the Template:Anti-government protests in the 21st century. Thanks in advance. Olsonspterom (talk) 22:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If it is not may be add it to the "Environmental" in the Template:Anti-government protests in the 21st century.
 * If that protest part of the Anti-austerity protests please add "Category:Anti-austerity measures protests in the European Union" the the article.


 * No, it's not anti-austerity, I guess I put it in the wrong section. It should be under the "Environmental" section. bogdan (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Romanian protests against the Roșia Montană Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Liberal Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Get lost with your trolling...
... just a stupid mistake! The Banner talk 22:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Nouseforkings.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Nouseforkings.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:04, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Gold cyanidation ban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Gunnison, La Rioja Province, Cordoba Province, Conejos, Costilla and Gilpin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shale gas in Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

COI stuff
Hi, a couple of things for you. First, this is starting to exasperate me. We have one "Popescu ionica" (her?) constantly reverting to a whitewashed version of Hellvig's biography, one that, for starters, conveniently omits mention of his legal troubles. She (he?) has also stated an odd editing philosophy, one in which engagement with pseudonymous users is not to be considered. This one is quite different in tone from Eheditor; regardless, Hellvig's office (I assume both work for him) seems to be trying hard to present their boss in a positive light.

We now have an article on the other main issue of the season (Roșia Montană aside). It could use some work, but at least it's a start to a long overdue article. - Biruitorul Talk 14:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, but... there's your answer. - Biruitorul Talk 13:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

File:Nouseforkings.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Nouseforkings.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gold cyanidation in Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Certej (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Football London Ilustrated News.gif
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Football London Ilustrated News.gif

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Anittas?
Hi, a quick question here. This fellow has been making some rather annoying edits on the Tismăneanu article, and I wonder if he might not be Anittas:


 * 1) Rapid familiarity with Wikipedia procedures
 * 2) Targeting an article by Dahn
 * 3) Using his very first edit to target Dahn - like other sockpuppets (e.g. this one, this one or this one)

Thanks for taking a look. - Biruitorul Talk 00:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Nouseforkings.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Nouseforkings.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fortications in Wallachia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Severin, Frumoasa and Poenari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Football London Ilustrated News.gif
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Football London Ilustrated News.gif

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Football London Ilustrated News.gif
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Football London Ilustrated News.gif

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Nouseforkings.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Nouseforkings.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:38, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Traynorb (talk) 23:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Ion Rațiu
How's your memory... at 22:19, 14 February 2006‎ you added the hatnote For the leader of the Transylvanian Memorandum, see Ioan Raţiu.. Now I have an enquiry at OTRS2014020210007254 where the poster says that last year (around October) the hatnote to Ioan Raţiu worked, but now it doesn't and is a red link. I can't see any previous pages with that name (or deleted ones, or similar names). He was questioning if pages with diacritics still worked correctly.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't think that the article Ioan Rațiu ever existed: there is nothing in archive.org, nothing in any wikipedia mirrors. There is an article in the Romanian Wikipedia. bogdan (talk) 22:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that - I'll pass it on.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 00:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Austro-Ungarii
Urmatorii sunt toti nascuti in Austro-Ungaria:

Octavian Goga

Liviu Rebreanu

Petru Groza

Traian Vuia

Ștefan Octavian Iosif

Le poti edita si acestora nationalitatea la fel ca lui Vlaicu. 24.175.228.172 (talk) 03:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drobeta-Turnu Severin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Severus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Șerban Vodă Inn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Cellar, Diwan, Smârdan, Constantin Cantacuzino and Grigore Ghica

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Football London Ilustrated News.gif
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Football London Ilustrated News.gif

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Cernavoda bridge 02.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for ZunZuneo
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Altamura Man
I've just removed a WP:Prod from this page, which is a bad translation of our Italian article. Any chance you could touch it up a bit? Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Romania
--Codrin.B (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

SVG?
What chance do I have of persuading you to turn the lovely symbol seen on flags in this picture into an svg? Dahn (talk) 01:18, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Tourism in Romania for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tourism in Romania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tourism in Romania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 21:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Văcărești. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Darius Vâlcov
 * added a link pointing to Slatina


 * Petre Gheorghe
 * added a link pointing to Kosice

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Fotbal in Suceava
Alexiulian25 (talk) 08:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)Vad ca ai creat multe articole despre Suceava. poti ajuta sa imbunatatim si articole cu echipele de fotbal din Suceava. cele care au fost.

Draft:CSM Suceava e creat de mine. dar nu stiu ce sa i mai fac ca sa l accepte. poate poti sa l imbunatatesti si sa i dai resubmit. Mersi

Orphaned non-free image File:Nu-Zaietz-01.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nu-Zaietz-01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Vikings-Voyages.png
Hi! You're the uploader of File:Vikings-Voyages.png. Could you please correct the typo: Staraya Lagoda → Staraya Ladoga (you can see the correct name in your source file File:Vikingen tijd.png, too). Thanks! DmitTrix (talk) 09:36, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, fixed that myself. DmitTrix (talk) 16:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Cuba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levisa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brăila, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ragusan, Argeș and Vicina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Râmnicu Vâlcea


A tag has been placed on Râmnicu Vâlcea, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stephenb (Talk) 07:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Fragaria
Category:Fragaria, which you created, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Strawberries. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Salut
Vad ca esti interesat in fotbalul romanesc, vrei sa ma ajuti sa cream articole care lipsesc. spre exemplu din editiile mai vechi ale cupei romaniei. I see you are interested in romanian football, would you like to help me by creating articles in Cupa României, English wikipedia. Thank you ! Alexiulian25 (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Lenin statue pulled down.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Lenin statue pulled down.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

why deletion of my wiki
this article about the professional digital artist art-germ, why deleting it , i see more of articles with no credible indication to be published but when i publish my article was on a famous artist with great art pieces so restore my article please ... because this artist done great efforts to be great like that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.34.29.187 (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

deletion my wiki
this article about the professional digital artist art-germ, why deleting it , i see more of articles with no credible indication to be published but when i publish my article was on a famous artist with great art pieces so restore my article please ... because this artist done great efforts to be great like that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.34.29.187 (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepspace600 (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peter A. Eckstein


A tag has been placed on Peter A. Eckstein, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:06, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Elias
why did you delete my page. I was trying to make a wikipedia page for my dad because it was his birthday on July and i didnt get him a present because he is always overseas EliasH20 (talk) 07:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)EliasH20 — Preceding unsigned comment added by EliasH20 (talk • contribs) 07:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ion Iliescu 1965 poster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ion Iliescu 1965 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

CFD
Notificare despre un CFD care v-ar putea interesa. XXN, 00:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Can you help verify translations of articles from
Hello,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from to English Wikipedia? This would involve evaluating a translated article on English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great.

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates Pass and Fail may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 09:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Royal Palace (Bucharest)
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Bogdangiusca, thanks for creating The Royal Palace (Bucharest)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. That page only represents the POV of the royal family, and serves as a WP:COATRACK which is completely unacceptable. Please add refernces about the subject, the palace, (not the family), that provide substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 02:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ecumenopolis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ecumenopolis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ecumenopolis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 23:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of bank robbers and robberies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bank robbers and robberies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of bank robbers and robberies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Origin of the Albanians


A tag has been placed on Origin of the Albanians, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Aleksandër I Madh Është Shqipëtar (talk) 11:50, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Bucharest Metro Map.png


The file File:Bucharest Metro Map.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 01:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Pavel Kiselev for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavel Kiselev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pavel Kiselev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 22:56, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Sports events by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Sports events by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 21:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Noua Dreapta.svg


The file File:Noua Dreapta.svg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 12:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Level 1 desysop of Bogdangiusca
Under the Level 1 desysopping procedures, the administrator permissions of have been temporarily removed as a suspected compromised account.

Supporting: BU Rob13, KrakatoaKatie, GorillaWarfare

For the Arbitration Committee, Bradv 🍁  18:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Recovering access to your account
Hello from Stewards,

Please contact ca@undefinedwikimedia.org to recover access to your account. Thank you. &mdash; regards, Revi 12:57, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

"Herr Wolf" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Herr Wolf. Since you had some involvement with the Herr Wolf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 11:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Călacea


A tag has been placed on Călacea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:14, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Călacea for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Călacea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Călacea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:31, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Danish philosophy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danish philosophy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Danish philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

"Chirpici" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chirpici. Since you had some involvement with the Chirpici redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. oknazevad (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wireframe bg.png


The file File:Wireframe bg.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

"Khazahstan" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Khazahstan. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

"Top 10 tallest buildings in Moscow" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Top 10 tallest buildings in Moscow. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Place names of German origin in Romania has been nominated for deletion
Category:Place names of German origin in Romania has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Earliest known manuscripts by language has been nominated for deletion
Category:Earliest known manuscripts by language has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Daask (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PC World (Store)


A tag has been placed on PC World (Store) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KamranBhatti4013 (talk) 05:00, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

"PC World (Store)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect PC World (Store). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. KamranBhatti4013 (talk) 05:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)