User talk:Bohamburg

CONFINTEA
The thing about creating articles about events is, we have a notability guideline for article subjects. For an article to merit inclusion, the event needs to have been covered my multiple reliable sources. Then, assuming the event is notable, the article has to be written as a neutral, factual and comprehensive encyclopedia entry. The encyclopedia does not exist to provide facts or advice to readers and it certainly is not a substitute or duplicate of the conference's own website. So far as the copyright on the text goes, you would need to explicitly release the content of the conference website under the GFDL or a similarly free license for it to be directly quoted to such a degree. See also What Wikipedia is not. The article has to be limited to providing notable facts about the conference, all sourced to independent reliable sources. The tone can be in no way promotional. IF you are connected to the conference organization you have a [{WP:COI|conflict of interest]] and may find it impossible to write and article so that it complies with all those guidelines. At the end of the day, if the conference is sufficiently noteworthy, someone else will eventually write and article about it. Mfield (Oi!) 22:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

File:LogoEducacentre-01.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:LogoEducacentre-01.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)