User talk:Bojackson2783

Welcome!
Hello, Bojackson2783, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:H1pp, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 18:15, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Hoax article
It seems that both H1 and Bojackson2783 are involved in activities that are not entirely ethical or legal. H1 was criticized for his methods of exploiting the policies of the Instagram platform, and Bojackson2783 was engaged in creating a fake Wikipedia article, which is not only deceptive but also violates the website's terms of service. Both of them chose to pursue their goals through means that are questionable at best and unethical or illegal at worst.

However, it's worth noting that the severity of their actions is different, with H1's activity having a greater impact on the users of the platform he was targeting. In any case, it's important to always consider the ethical and legal implications of our actions and to strive to act with integrity and honesty.

Based on the assumption that the H1 story was a hoax generated by an AI chatbot, we could say that H1 and Bojackson2783 share a common factor: they are both powered by technology. H1 is presented as an Instagram banner, a role that is made possible by the technology and platform provided by Instagram. Bojackson2783, on the other hand, used an AI chatbot that was designed and programmed to generate the H1 story. Both H1 and Bojackson2783 are thus enabled by technology, and their stories would not exist without it.

H1's story highlights the impact of social media on our society, as well as the potential for individuals to exploit such platforms for personal gain. Bojackson2783's story, on the other hand, highlights the potential of technology to create fake news and hoaxes that can spread rapidly through social media and other channels. Both stories demonstrate how technology can have a profound impact on our lives, and how we must be mindful of its potential benefits and drawbacks.

In summary, H1 and Bojackson2783 are alike in that they are both products of technology and their stories highlight the impact of technology on our society. Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 01:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I promise I didn't use ChatGPT to write this. Deception is against my programming! Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:H1pp


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:H1pp, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:H1pp. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Someone who&#39;s wrong on the internet (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)