User talk:Bokmanrocks01

Welcome!

Hello, Bokmanrocks01, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Po land, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Moogwrench (talk) 03:11, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Po land


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Po land, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Moogwrench (talk) 03:11, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Portal:Mummy


A tag has been placed on Portal:Mummy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. John of Reading (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Po land


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Po land, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Glacialfox (talk) 02:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Donald Trump infobox
Hi there. You previously participated in a previous conversation about the best way to reflect Donald Trump's business career in his infobox. You might be interested in an active RfC on this topic. Edge3 (talk) 03:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 01:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

"Small" in Trump infobox
Hello. MOS:FONTSIZE advises against using small or other font-reduction techniques in infoboxes. My understanding is that this is an accessibility issue, an area that Wikipedia takes somewhat seriously. I removed the "smalls" from the Trump infobox about 18 hours ago, with a clear explanation in my edit summary. Now I see that you have added back the "smalls" without any mention whatsoever in your edit summary. I'll give you some time to self-revert or explain why this infobox should deviate from the guideline; barring both I'll go ahead and revert you. Thanks. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  01:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Well if you look at the articles of Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, or even Andrew Jackson, you would see that small is also used to summarize their political affiliations. With Donald Trump being a similar type of article about a prominent US politician, using the same technique wouldn't be a unprecedented edit that crosses a line or anything. BTW, small, was also used with the "officeholder" template that was in place for Donald Trump before it was converted to the present one yesterday. MOS:FONTSIZE also doesn't strictly forbid using small, just highly discourages it, if you want to make the "strictly by the guidelines" point. - Bokmanrocks01 (talk) 02:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I just wanted to touch base and be sure I wasn't missing something significant. I'll make the change and you're welcome to try your rationale on the Trump talk page. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  02:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * 1. Very little at Wikipedia is strictly forbidden, so it's hardly significant that this is not. 2. There is no reason to believe that editors at the other articles were even aware of the guideline, or that any of them cared a whit about accessibility. I just recently learned of the guideline myself, after 3.5 years. 3. The existence of bad stuff does not justify the creation of more of it. It's not reasonable to say that a guideline can't or shouldn't be observed at one article unless it's observed for all similar articles. That reasoning tends to bring progress to a grinding halt.


 * You did it again. This is never going to fly unless you get talk page consensus to deviate from MOS. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  05:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Trump infobox RfC
Hello there. I saw your edit to open an RfC. Just a reminder that you need to use the rfc template. The instructions are on WP:RFC. Let me know if you need help! Edge3 (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Census stuff
The answer to why the number that adds up to 104% is correct is simple - people can choose multiple races on the US census (source: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/06/11/chapter-1-race-and-multiracial-americans-in-the-u-s-census/). For some reason you want to use the data that excludes multiracial people who chose to check multiple boxes, which, unless you've got a compelling justification for it, seems wrong. The consistency argument is misleading since you made the same change to the other data earlier, an edit which should incidentally be reverted. Rwenonah (talk) 23:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Discussion invite
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 14:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Tom Taylor (actor)
We don't add anyone's age directly, as it will be out of date by next year, so I've reverted. When I can find the right template I'll add it instead - watch this space. Pam D  11:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Found it: . The "df=yes" makes it appear as "16 July 2001" rather than "July 16, 2001". I've fixed this article.  Pam  D  11:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Canada does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

RfCs
Before you incorrectly create an RfC at the Australia article the way you did on the Canada article, please see WP:RfC.
 * Before using the RfC process to get opinions from outside editors, it's often faster and more effective to thoroughly discuss the matter with any other parties on the related talk page. Editors are normally expected to make a reasonable attempt at working out their disputes before seeking help from others. If you are able to come to a consensus or have your questions answered through discussion with other editors, then there is no need to start an RfC.

Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * A consensus from an rfc is more definitive, rather than an on/off discussion with a few editors. It's the quickest way to resolve the issue. - Bokmanrocks01 (talk) 01:50, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

NCOP
Hi Bokmanrocks01, when you changed Chairperson of National Council of Provinces to Chairperson of National Council at this diff. Why? The name is the NCOP (National Council of Provinces). National Council is incorrect and since it's a chairperson name in South Africa article I think it should be as accurate as possible. Best, Waddie96 (talk) 07:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Feel free to change it back if you feel it necessary. National Council of Provinces is also shortened to National Council in the Legislature section of the infobox, so I felt it wasn't inconsistent to shorten the name of the office for chairperson. Bokmanrocks01 (talk) 04:43, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Use of light blue
The Independents in the Senate do caucus with the Democrats. However, they are still independents and should be colored as such, with a note that they caucus with the Dems. Light blue is sometimes used for Dems, and other times for so-called "Independent Democrats," which King and Sanders are not. I do appreciate the subtlety of this question, however, and I'm willing to discuss or be convinced otherwise. It is an interesting issue, but for now they should be left as "Independent" yellow. Thanks. —GoldRingChip 19:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
 * But who decided yellow should be the color for independents? Isn't it the color for the Libertarian Party? Won't a more neutral color like grey be more appropriate? Bokmanrocks01 (talk) 06:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know where the yellow came from, actually. Grey is ordinarily a good color.  In fact, the color for Independents outside of the United States is grey, but it's sometimes used for other purposes other than parties (such as Party shading/Hold), whereas yellow really stands out.  Maybe it's used in popular media outside of Wikipedia?  Libertarian yellow is usually different enough because it's a dark goldish yellow.


 * | Libertarian
 * | Hold
 * | Others
 * | Independent
 * | Independent (United States)
 * }
 * This is quite a debatable point for a broader group (to develop WP consensus). But until then, let's keep these congressional tables with the yello.  —GoldRingChip 00:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * | Independent (United States)
 * }
 * This is quite a debatable point for a broader group (to develop WP consensus). But until then, let's keep these congressional tables with the yello.  —GoldRingChip 00:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * This is quite a debatable point for a broader group (to develop WP consensus). But until then, let's keep these congressional tables with the yello.  —GoldRingChip 00:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Where's the panic?
Howdy. All those changes you made to the House & Senate & related articles, are premature. None of those events happen, until Noon EST, today. GoodDay (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Oregon Secretary of State
I noticed you have changed my edit on the Oregon Wikipedia page, removing the reference to Oregon Treasurer Tobias Read and instead saying the office of Secretary of State is vacant. The reason I changed this was because after the death of Secretary of State Dennis Richardson, Read became next in the line of succession for governor. The Governor of Oregon will be able to appoint another Secretary of State who will serve until the next election, but that individual will be ineligible to serve as Governor if a vacancy comes about during the meantime. The elected State Treasurer, not the appointed Secretary of State, will become the new Governor, and for this reason, I am restoring my edit. Count Awesome (talk) 02:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Hi Bokmanrocks01! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Nancy Pelosi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. And use an edit summary. RexxS (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Tsai Ing-wen and Numbering of Taiwanese Presidents
Hi Bokmanrocks01 - I disagree with your recent reversion on the Tsai Ing-wen article but wanted to talk to you first before making any changes. Namely, the "President of the ROC" title has been in use since before 1947 but it referred to a very different concept (akin to the current President of China), and not the President of Taiwan (essentially just the Taiwan island). Hence official government websites and news outlets all refer to Presidents since 1947 as Presidents of ROC, and major news outlets will use the "seventh" designation. One comparison similar to this is the Governors of California, where before 1851 it referred to a different concept of California and hence those Governors are placed in a separate article. Only after 1851 is the "first" Governor of California considered to have been elected, as it is the modern concept of California and not just the name. Hope this helps and hope we can agree on adding the number back! CityPride (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Your edit to Fuuka (manga) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Link20XX (talk) 00:48, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It was not my intention to violate any copyright rules. I thought referencing the source was enough, although I did consider whether it would be better to add quotes around the entire summaries as well. Regardless, I agree with your reversion of my edit because it broke the copyright rules, and I would keep this in mind for future edits. Cheers. - Bokmanrocks01 (talk) 00:59, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)