User talk:Bold Management

Block
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I would strongly advise reading WP:TOU - our terms of use. Paid editing, whether directly as an employee of a company or as someone working on behalf of a client, MUST be declared. Please also read WP:COI about conflict of interest - editing on subjects you have a connection to. Peridon (talk) 16:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Peridon. Please advise how to unblock my account. As there is a conflict of interest I won't be editing the page any longer.
 * Please sign posts on talk pages with ~ to put your sig and the time stamp on. Thanks. Editing with a COI or for pay aren't forbidden - they just get watched a bit more carefully. If you aren't going to edit that page, the next point that comes up is, "What are you going to edit instead?". (This bit usually gets put on as a template, but I don't know where it is and prefer being more personal if possible.) There are a lot of editors who stick to one article and manage to keep neutral. There are others that fall foul of WP:OWN. So long as you recognise that unfavourable material that's properly referenced cannot be removed (even though the client doesn't like it...), and stick to the normal editing rules, all that's required is a declaration on your user page, or on the talk page of any affected article. Someone will notify, caution or warn you if you're going wrong. Take note, and ask for help if this happens - before it gets to the block for disruptive stage. Your edit wasn't promo or disruptive - it just wasn't reliably sourced WP:RS. With biographies of living people, things have to be sourced (even if they're nice things). Peridon (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)