User talk:Bollymine

Speedy deletion nomination of Jjaibot
Hello Bollymine,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jjaibot for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meeanaya (talk) 02:45, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Jjaibot
Hello, Bollymine

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meeanaya and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jjaibot, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Jjaibot.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Meeanaya (talk) 05:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Digraj Singh Shahpura for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digraj Singh Shahpura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Digraj Singh Shahpura until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 06:59, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Khadse Rohini Eknathrao
Hello, Bollymine,

Thank you for creating Khadse Rohini Eknathrao.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Hi, there. I have added a few tags to the article. Please improve. Keep contributing!"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright Talk  (plz ping) 08:12, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Bordikar Meghana Deepak Sakore moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bordikar Meghana Deepak Sakore, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Interstellarity (talk) 16:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)