User talk:Bolt Lightning

Speedy deletion of Bioticising
A tag has been placed on Bioticising requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  The Helpful One (Talk)(Contributions) (Review Me!) 13:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Bioticising
You recently started the page Bioticising, a quick Google search shows that zero pages using the term. From this I think that you may be mistaken about the term and it suitability as the topic of an article and have nominated it for speedy deletion per gerneal criteria 1. If you feel I have made a mistake please add  to the top of the talk page for the article [Talk:Bioticising|the article's talk page]]. If you wish to learn more about Wikipedi'a key policies and guidelines including those which deal with inclusion criteria for articles this page might be a helpful starting point. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 13:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)]]