User talk:BoltonCentralSchoolNY

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bolton Central School (February 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bolton Central School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Bolton_Central_School Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bolton_Central_School reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BoltonCentralSchoolNY


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:BoltonCentralSchoolNY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bolton Central School


A tag has been placed on Draft:Bolton Central School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Theroadislong (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
 * Provide a new username.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ✗ plicit  14:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
Due to the promotional nature of your edits and your wp:conflict of interest, I cannot see unblocking this account to edit about this subject, at least not until you have shown the ability to edit non promotionally in other areas. You will need to describe what non promotional edits you will make not about this subject. (The subtext of this request is that you are only here to promote this school.) Please adjust your unblock request accordingly. You also need to propose and individual a new user name, as pointed out in the block notice. Thanks. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The article you mention is a poor example to use, as it is problematic itself, and I have marked it as such. Using any random article as a model or example is not a good idea, see other stuff exists. If you want to use other articles as a model, use those that are classified as good articles. 331dot (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes, I would like to use my real name for our username.
 * We are working on making the content non promotional.

BoltonCentralSchoolNY (talk) 13:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * please don't post article content here, I have removed it...please note that articles are based on independent sources NOT want you want to say about your school. Theroadislong (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia is not a directory, so an organization is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a public school, it is treated the same as an organization; so it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the school must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what an organization wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:50, 7 May 2024 (UTC)