User talk:Boman1990

License tagging for Image:Impact is imminent.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Impact is imminent.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 20:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on NitroSpine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 00:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

January 2009
This is your only warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mfield (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. '':: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. '' The Real Libs-speak politely 15:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tupac Shakur. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tupac Shakur was changed by Boman1990 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-02-06T14:47:03+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 2 weeks from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.

I'm not sure this merits an indefinite block unless the account was compromised in the last couple of days (as the edit history would suggest). Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I did a short block a few days ago to take account of some useful contributions. As AIV was rather full this afternoon, i picked indeed wrongly VOA instead of Vandalism, so i adjusted that for the moment as well as the block length to two weeks and replaced above message. Personally I'd like to see a statement or unblock request, but as I leave shortly I defer to any further adjustment including resetting to indef or unblock by anyone who sees fit.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Lol
I catch you vandalising within 10 seconds of the edits being made. Please just grow up. Shnitzled (talk) 19:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)