User talk:Bombpackage2

Blame
Immediately starting with an accusation of vandalism isn't the most constructive way of interacting. Next time, you might better simply ask why someone made a certain edit before drawing conclusions too quickly. In this case, please read Categorization. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Radar detector detector detector detector


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Radar detector detector detector detector, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints&#124;Mistakes) 00:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

April 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Walrus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Ditto re Blanchinus, Big Rock, California, and User talk:Elmidae Eric talk 16:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

May 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Please be careful, as even a well-intended correction of a typo in someone else's talk page message can have negative consequences. It's generally best not to do that. Thanks.'' Murph 9000  (talk) 13:59, 3 May 2017 (UTC)