User talk:Bomctuck

Image copyright problem with Image:100 1221.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:100 1221.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:11, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Your recent edit to Salonta (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 06:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Salonta's Reformed Cathedral.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Salonta Reformed Cathedral.JPG. The copy called Image:Salonta Reformed Cathedral.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 07:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Salonta's Reformed Cathedral.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Salonta's Reformed Cathedral.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Salonta Calvinist Cathedral.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Image-Cathedral in Salonta.jpg. The copy called Image:Image-Cathedral in Salonta.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 07:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Beiuş. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Beiuş was changed by Bomctuck (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-18T08:02:47+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Cacacios
A tag has been placed on Cacacios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  ClanCC  ( T |undefined /  C ) 08:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)