User talk:Bomispediaprashant

Nomination of SCED Institute of IT and Management for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SCED Institute of IT and Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SCED Institute of IT and Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shrikanthv (talk) 12:13, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Realtec Computer Education
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Realtec Computer Education, may be copied from http://realtec.org/aboutus.php. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 11:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Realtec Computer Education


A tag has been placed on Realtec Computer Education requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of NIPS Computer Institute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NIPS Computer Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NIPS Computer Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  06:56, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Apple Computer Education for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apple Computer Education is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Apple Computer Education until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  10:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  11:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. All of your editing has been adding articles about educational institutions that do not seem to satisfy Wikipedia's notability standards, and most of them seem to be written as promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. However, more important still is the fact that several, if not all, of the articles appear to have infringed copyright. That is not merely a question of Wikipedia policy, but of the law. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Let me add that failure to comply with the policy as stated by JamesBWatson will lead to your being prevented from editing here. In view of the seriousness of copyright law this is your only warning.--Anthony Bradbury"talk"  15:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)