User talk:Bone for life

Welcome!
Hello, Bone for life, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management.
 * Your references are all to primary sources, and not one is linked to a website. Although it's not a requirement for sources to be accessible, it doesn't help notability if there isn't coverage in accessible sources. You need independent third-party sources.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. You write it like a sales leaflet (What... Why... How]], complete with ®. It's not our job to protect your registered mark. Examples of unsourced or inadequately sourced claims presented as fact include: the gold standard examination... 3D-SHAPER automatic image processing can be integrated seamlessly into the DXA workflow as each 3D analysis are performed in less than two minutes... Strong correlations were found between 3D measurements as assessed by 3D-SHAPER and QCT, with correlation coefficients... 3D-SHAPER is a unique medical imaging solution in the field of bone densitometry that allows researchers and clinicians to...  sourcing to a single paper doesn't make something incontestable fact.
 * the article was a copyright violation of at least this site. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The copied site was marked Copyright © Galgo Medical SL 2017. All Rights Reserved. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:     . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

We often restore deleted text on request, but for legal reasons we don't do so for copyright violations. Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

I suggest that you look at WikiProject Medicine and Good_articles/Natural_sciences too

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:45, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jimfbleak,

Thank you for your detailed answer. I am reading over and over the guidance on how to write an article and the kind of eligible sources, and am wondering why the sources I have added are not accepted. Most of the technical information I have added are verifiable by reading relevant scientific publications, in peer-review articles, from scientific and clinician teams, and mostly by top ones, including some reference from the World Health Organization. They are the one to declare that DXA is the "gold standard examination" for osteoporosis diagnosis, and that is what is done in clinical practice since the 90's.  I understand some of the text shall be re-written to ensure there is no copyright violation or promotional tune, but the above sentence is just true when it comes to osteoporosis diagnosis, and it is confirmed by the International Societies editing guidelines for bone explorations in the context of osteoporosis(WHO, ISCD, NOF, IOF).

So I am wondering, is it because I have not added links to pubmed for instance, that you consider the source as not valid? I am asking as it is important when editing my article to try to re-submit, taking into account your remarks of course. Also, I was wondering whether it would be possible to restore my text in my sandbox so I can work on it on wikipedia?

I hope you will see my answer here... Thanks, Bone for life (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Bone for lifeBone for life (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)