User talk:Bonechicken1974

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Allen Eller has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:53, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Allen Eller was changed by Bonechicken1974 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96597 on 2016-11-05T07:53:11+00:00.

Your recent editing history at Allen Eller shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. bonadea contributions talk 08:00, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Allen Eller, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  JW  Noctis talk to me 08:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism
This edit is just plain vandalism. Please stop the vandalism. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC) Bitch

Bonechicken1974, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Allen Eller, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Allen Eller was changed by Bonechicken1974 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92308 on 2016-11-06T19:32:53+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:32, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emma Stone. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Emma Stone was changed by Bonechicken1974 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958406 on 2016-11-06T19:39:31+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)