User talk:Bonejoint

Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:
 * 1) Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
 * 2) We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do.  Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.  (For the difference between primary and secondary sources, see WP:MEDDEF.)
 * 3) Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS). High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
 * 4) The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
 * 5) More generally see WP:MEDHOW
 * 6) Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
 * 7) We use very few capital letters and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
 * 8) Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities.
 * 9) Do not use URLs from your university library's internal net: the rest of the world cannot see them.
 * 10) Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article.
 * 11) Please format citations consistently within an article and be sure to cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books; see WP:MEDHOW for how to format citations.
 * 12) Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
 * 13) Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

MEDRS
please read link this ref is not appropriate ,,,, and ….please discuss on talk page  --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Osteogenesis imperfecta
Hello—both User:Ozzie10aaaa and User:Doc James have warned you in past about medical sourcing. Please stop making edits like this one. Neither your MCTO source nor your MONA source mentioned osteogenesis imperfecta at all. The § "Differential diagnosis" of any article is never meant to be an exhaustive listing of all skeletal dysplasias or, worse, genetic disorders. It is meant to list disorders that clinicians are likely to confuse. Confusable conditions will appear in reliable sources. My source for confusable diseases needed to be considered on a differential diagnosis are two different OI textbooks. If a WP:MEDRS does not let us know that doctors have a hard time differentiating MONA and OI, then we can't say that. Furthermore, think about it. MCTO causes missing bones…that's never a symptom of OI. MONA is the same, and also causes corneal issues, which, again, are not found in OI. Happy editing, please be more careful in future. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 03:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Pattern of refs
Hello, Bonejoint. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add requestedit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

DMacks (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)