User talk:Bonelayer12864

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Motivation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. M D Potter. Any comments? 19:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you please elaborate on why you think this is false. M D Potter. Any comments? 19:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that's general information, not specific to your school. M D Potter. Any comments? 20:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know anything about this so I'll have leave this to other editors. M D Potter. Any comments? 20:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid as I don't understand this I'll ask you to do this. Thanks. M D Potter. Any comments? 20:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Edge of Reality has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Wayne Olajuwon  chat   20:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. —  Jeff G. ツ  22:51, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Guoguo12 --Talk--  22:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

New messages
Guoguo12 --Talk--  22:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Princess Daisy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Princess Daisy.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of illustration
Bonelayer, you have twice deleted a perfectly valid illustration, a work of art in a museum, in the article The Ant and the Grasshopper. If this happens again without you giving a valid reason on the discussion page, I'll report you for starting an edit war and that carries penalties. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 01:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Youtube personalities
Please do not add new entries unless they (1) have their own established articles indicating notability or (2) include a reliable third-party source indicating notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Princess Daisy.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Princess Daisy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Ja Ga  talk 07:02, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Anti-Nintendo Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Anti-Nintendo Logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Niger (disambiguation) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 00:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've redacted the warning -- that was an error on my part. I would, however, suggest that next time you contact me if you think I've made an error rather than just re-editing. Again, I apologize. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 01:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to United States twenty-dollar bill constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Wikipelli  Talk   02:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear ma'am, I was simply stating something from hidden message. It was not vandalism. You acted in bad faith. This is NOT a personal attack.

Your disruptive edits
Could you please not make disruptive edits? I know you think you're being wacky and irreverent but it's a waste of time. ... disco spinster   talk  05:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arceusism


The article Arceusism has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not verifiable in reliable sources - only references are a blog and a wiki.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peter E. James (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Arceusism for deletion
The article Arceusism is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arceusism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Peter E. James (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

User subpages
Your pages of "Truthipedia" silliness are not an appropriate use of userspace. On the off-chance that you want to keep this content, I'll give you a few days to save it locally, then I'm going through and deleting it all.

You can make things go easier by adding to each page. DS (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Poyo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Island Monkey talk the talk 14:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Island Monkey talk the talk 14:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bonelayer12864. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Island Monkey talk the talk 14:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  04:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Arceusism listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arceusism. Since you had some involvement with the Arceusism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Bonelayer12864/Magikarp
User:Bonelayer12864/Magikarp, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bonelayer12864/Magikarp and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Bonelayer12864/Magikarp during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"Toadistan" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Toadistan. Since you had some involvement with the Toadistan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reach Out to the Truth 00:11, 21 August 2019 (UTC)