User talk:Bongwarrior/Archive 15

Block evasion
Please block. It is obviously the same with the confirmed sock 31.193.140.164 (talk) 08:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Just blocked by Tiptoety. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:09, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Message from Santosadriann
Mr. Bongwarrior, why did you delete my article? I'm still writing the its contents. --Santosadriann (talk) 03:51, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * There wasn't anything there. You don't need to make a placeholder for it - when you're done writing, go ahead and post it then. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:58, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay. Drafting then posting is not allowed. Thank you!. Santosadriann

The latest wave of socks
Thanks for the quick blocks on these; the ghost-toast guy tends to vandalize pretty rapidly and that saves some rollbacks. Note that I'm also reporting these to SPI, at this point more in the interest of documenting the vandal's edit patterns and keeping a "paper" trail of sorts as to which accounts are his. Part of the case is currently on hold over there, as it looks like we're merging the case that's open right now with an earlier one, which editors didn't realize was connected to the latest string of these accounts right away. dalahäst (let's talk!) 05:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Additional account for SPI you're doing
Hi, I noticed you were looking into some accounts for WP:SOCK at the moment. You might want to look at as related to  et al as well. Very similar edits on newspaper and Web development. I can post an actual SPI if you prefer, but I figured you might just want to block this one too while you were still looking at it. Thanks!

Example diffs: ,

~ RobTalk 05:53, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure these are the same guy we've been seeing a lot of lately. I think this diff speaks for itself. dalahäst (let's talk!) 05:55, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm sure it is. ~ RobTalk 05:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Toursabaft is absolutely the same guy, must have slipped through the cracks. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * There's a small backlog of pretty obvious ones that haven't been blocked at the SPI page; I've been keeping track of them all until they do get blocked, as well as keeping an eye out for new ones. dalahäst (let's talk!) 06:32, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking out - I've blocked those ones plus a few more. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:17, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

TheAirsoftPlayer
I blocked him for abusing multiple accounts. Links that tell the tale:     

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I had thought might be related to, since the former popped up right after blocking two accounts belonging to the latter, but maybe not. So much socking, I'm not sure I know who is who anymore. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hard to say. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Now we have TheAirsoftPlayer requesting unblock. Consider deleting the entire page and removing talk access as you did here with this sock. I should not be the one because I was the blocker. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I'd rather let a third admin handle it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello
I made few disruptive edits to Article to make you guys realise that it needs to be protected. Thanks 123.201.175.123 (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Not really. It's usually easier to block the IP or user. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Bhano Langa and AfD
Bhano langa to me doesnt meet the notabily guidelines. I was gonna do the nom on Afd but i dont know how. I wanted to ask you to look at the article and see if it is good or bad and put on afd if it is bad. Sry grammar just joined this wiki! Hope you have a good day! PackersFan2015 (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2015 (UTC) PackersFan2015


 * Hi there. It's not exactly good, but it's extremely unlikely to be deleted, and I don't think an AfD would accomplish anything. Most populated places are automatically presumed to be notable; see WP:NGEO for the relevant guideline. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Josh Dun
I simply wanted to notify you a new account started vandalizing the page. SwisterTwister  talk  06:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Many thanks as that one was persistent. Cheers! SwisterTwister   talk  06:49, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem. I've semiprotected the page again, there seem to be some recurring issues there. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Ferociouslettuce
Would you be willing to have a look at User:Ferociouslettuce's recent edits? It looks like they are back to the same disruptive conspiracy theory pushing that got them blocked late last month. VQuakr (talk) 06:51, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello sir. .I would similarly appreciate you looking at VQuakr as well as DisusesKid. As the talk page indicates, I found a consensus, and the users holding the original disagreement were resolved. Within the overall article, thee section occupies less than the reaction of batman executives to the shooting in colorado and it is all very well sourced. intro was reverted to previous default. not mentioning businessinsider, washingtonpost & msnbc sources is wiki not doing its job properly Ferociouslettuce (talk) 06:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I looked at the talk page. The consensus never allowed you to make those kinds of edits. It only stated that they were warranted if they were still in the context of WP:FRINGE, reliably sourced, and extremely notable in the mainstream public. Sure, people still question the description of events that happened in the theater. But there is no investigation into the official account's legitimacy and it is highly agreed among the public that Holmes is the shooter and acted alone. DisuseKid (talk) 07:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Are we really still doing this? Consensus there seems to favor less conspiracy nuttiness, not more. You and I both know how this movie ends if you keep going on like you have, so pump the brakes already. Pretty please. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:29, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Both and I worked out our differences so that the intro remained unchanged. He and I both feel that the reverts of DisuseKid were being disruptive. Michaelmalak thanked me for my edits and added an additional passage. While I agree with the addition of Michaelmalak as a source more notable than Gawker, I think that  and I can agree to include the Conspiracy theory regarding the Multiple Shooters in the article, but relegate MKUltra info to something similar to Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories. Including sources from washingtonpost, Business Insider, MSNBC as well as the original recording of the police response is helpful in contending with information presented by the NYT & Bloomberg and a lack of surveillance from Cinemark Theatres. Ferociouslettuce (talk) 22:57, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Take the hints that numerous editors are trying to give you: this silliness has absolutely no basis in reality, and it has no place in the article. The several editors who have interacted with you on this topic have displayed admirable patience, and I hope I have as well, but enough is enough. Let it go. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:51, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem here is WP:WEIGHT and WP:RGW. As of 2015, it is pretty much impossible to find mainstream media sources covering the theory that multiple shooters were involved at Aurora. Both the prosecution and the defense at the trial have accepted that James Holmes was the sole shooter. The multiple shooters theory is unsuitable for the WP:LEAD, and the material removed in this edit was too long and detailed.-- ♦Ian Ma c  M♦  (talk to me) 05:34, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Mistake
I think you have made a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosspapa (talk • contribs) 02:20, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * A look at your edit shows vandalism that Bongwarrior quite properly reverted. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 02:32, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Bianchi
Sorry for changing template but please refrain citing 18th as date of death. Family statement is clear. CtrlXctrlV (talk) 08:39, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The template that I am adding and you are removing has absolutely nothing to do with the date of death. It documents the date the item was added to the In the news section of the Main Page. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:42, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Black privilege
Is there an SPI case for the user who makes the Black Privilege stuff? is an example of a sock you banned for abusing multiple accounts who made that page.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 04:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)


 * None that I'm aware of. I don't think the user has been all that active. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:41, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Sock puppetry at Nikka Whisky Distilling?
It's not a big deal, but I don't understand your pp-sock at Nikka Whisky Distilling (this edit). The article has barely been edited for a long time, and the edits in the last 6 months don't look like a problem. —BarrelProof (talk) 15:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi there. That article was one of several being targeted by this guy over the past several days. Another admin removed the edits, so they are no longer visible in the history. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh. Obviously the notion of admin-removed edits hadn't occurred to me. I'll try to remember that in the future if I see something similar happen again. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it's a practice I'm generally not a huge fan of because it tends to reduce transparency and increase confusion. Take care. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, since I left that note on your page, my Talk page has been vandalized twice by someone referring to this discussion. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Another sock, but a different one. It's good to have variety, I guess. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Irony
I am from Colorado and I saw your revert...fundemental differences ;) []. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Needless to say, I am green with envy. Won't be long for the rest of us, hopefully. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Apologies
Sincere ones, for that stupid blocking error. I'm obviously too tired to use Twinkle properly, so I'll give up for a while. —S MALL JIM   17:07, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem at all, accidents happen. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Oops
Thank you for your revert of my revert at there. I had just reverted the vandalism but I accidentally undid the wrong edit because I had managed to warn my ownself. Just wondering, how did you find my edit? Optakeover (Talk)  19:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I was just checking some AIV reports. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help. Optakeover  (Talk)  19:25, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your voice of reason in the vandalism report board.

See this that I posted just now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Winkelvi#Please_stop

No names left!! abcd (talk) 17:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

A logged-in user active on a blocked IP addresses talk page.
Thanks for your actions concerning 199.227.176.108. But now the same user appears to be engaging in the same behavior via a logged in account: Pashedmotatos. --SpyMagician (talk) 03:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks, NeilN got there first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I blocked them for a bit longer. Drmies (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Instant block evasion
And they just IP-hopped to 119.81.124.82 to evade the block. Creative. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I've blocked the new one and semiprotected the two talk pages for a short while. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your quick response. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 02:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Legend
I'm extremely sorry about the picture that was uploaded to the "legend" definition page. My friend had hold of my account and proceeded to modify the page by posting a picture of someone we know. I believe that it is fair that you ban my account or take whatever action you need. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyeknowuh (talk • contribs) 02:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem just yet. Stuff like that isn't usually a huge concern unless it keeps happening over and over. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Protection
Thanks for banning Ozamatas Buckshank, even though that is one of my favorite player named by K&P. Can you protect Washington Nationals? I'm a one man non-admin army. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I had wandered off for a little bit to watch the new Colbert show. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism using your name
Hi I hate to do this to you but your name is being used to deface our wikipage. Maybe you would be able to help in tracking down the culprits. After all, now it is personal.

Hello, I'm Jesssleelee. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Macarthur Adventist College because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jesssleelee (talk) 02:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I momentarily reverted to the wrong version, before I caught it and restored the correct version. You are welcome. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Revert
Thanks for reverting the personal attack on my page. Tiggerjay (talk) 07:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Welcome, and thank you for for reverting the rest. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Wipsterte
Hi Bongwarrior

Why did you block the new page for Wipsterte? It is an official team competing in a South African golf tournament.

Thanks

Ernest — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErnestNorth (talk • contribs) 20:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Ernest. Neither the team or the tournament appeared to be notable. I did a quick Google search, and it didn't turn up much of anything. We generally only have articles on topics that have already been covered in reliable and independent sources. If there are sources out there that I have overlooked, I do apologize, and I hope this doesn't discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia in the future. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Editing wiki
Hey do you keep deleting my edits on the October 2nd wiki page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B11C:31FE:9BA8:E00A:7D8B:B2FA (talk) 04:57, 2 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The people you are adding aren't notable - please see WP:NLIST. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:00, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Looking For Admin Help
Hey...I've been approached to do a "Paid Disclosure" page by the subject of this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Boxer_Wachler  I gladly lay out the history for your review and as messy and sordid as it is (which I was in no way part of), he's actually Wikipedia notable based upon may research. The page has been locked down due to its past history and I'm wondering if it's possible to "unlock" it if we can prove notability. Please offer me your thoughts. Barbequeue (talk) 17:30, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Eh, I'm not too enthused about the idea. It was only deleted a month ago, and all the COI/socking surrounding the article makes it very difficult to prove much of anything. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:40, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

FYI
Any idea who this is?--5 albert square (talk) 23:19, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * That is this guy. I've disabled his email, because he routinely abuses it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks. It was obviously someone's sock, I just didn't know who it belonged to!--5 albert square (talk) 00:28, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

History of American football
The featured article History of American football, an article you have edited significantly in the past, is currently at around 160 kb in length. The maximum allowable article size per WP:SIZE is 100 kb. While some bits of information could probably be pared down, most of the article is still surprisingly well written and referenced (despite growing in size by 2/3rds since being promoted to FA status several years ago). The article will need to be brought back to a smaller size, a discussion is underway at Talk:History of American football to decide the best way to handle that. We want to preserve all of the good information there, but the rules require us to split the article up somehow. If you are interested in helping decide how to do that, please come by the article talk page where the discussion is currently underway. Thanks! -- Jayron 32 12:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Daniel Valdez
Hello,

I was about to create a biographical article titled "Daniel Valdez" when I read from a pink rectangle that there have been two previous articles that have been deleted, and they both shared the same title. As you can see on the pink rectangle, it also says "If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below."

Therefore, I am writing this message to you because I am "unsure" if I was about to recreate the article you deleted on May 3, 2010. The article I was going to create is about a living person by the name of Daniel Valdez. He is the younger brother of playwright Luis Valdez. He has also acted in film; the movies he appeared in include Zoot Suit (film) and The China Syndrome. Was the article you deleted about the living person that I told you about? I wanted to check with you just in case, since you are the "deleting administrator" in this case.

Thank you. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * (Talk page stalker) No, the deleted article was not about the actor, it was simple vandalism about someone with the same name. Black Kite (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yep, what Black Kite said. I don't see any issues if you want to create an article about the actor. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Valdosta High School
Hey I was just wondering how I could fix my problems on the Valdosta High School page. I'm trying to update it because the info is outdated. Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomersooner99 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hey Boomer. Referencing is very important. If you are writing about living people, it's a requirement. News sources are usually best, but for information about the school itself, the school website probably works fine also. Individual students don't need to be named unless they have achieved notability after high school - they may be notable to you or within the school, but we're writing a global encyclopedia, and the world really doesn't care. Similarly, try to avoid obvious silliness like "the Lorna-Name Controversy of 2015." Stuff like this will always be removed as soon as someone else notices it. And that's about it, have fun. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you that was really helpful. I've been having trouble adding stuff but you're right, I could reference the school. I'll let you know if I keep having problems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomersooner99 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * If you're going to reference the school's website, please link the specific page where the information is located - don't just link the homepage and expect the reader to hunt for it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I've indef blocked this editor as their subsequent edits were lacked credibility. --Neil N  talk to me 01:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!


Happy Halloween!

Hello Bongwarrior: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –  North America1000 23:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. Sent to users on my mailing list. To opt-out forever, just remove your name.

The Whipped Cream edit
Apologies for that. Did it do get back at a mate. Sorry for inconvenience though :) Bobcakes1969 (talk) 06:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Respone
Can you and admins permanently protect GoAnimate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoAnimate with gold lock protection as admins will edit it. Please? 112.209.86.65 (talk) 08:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * It's already semiprotected. At a glance, there doesn't appear to be a need for full protection. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your recent block of "Lolololollolollololilolliliillolillol"
Hi, regarding your recent block of Lolololollolollololilolliliillolillol, doesn't it also violate WP:Username policy as a disruptive username? &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 03:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Technically, no, but it certainly doesn't help. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion
Hey man It is a new religion founded in Northern Virginia based on a belief that Bandar Alsharhan. You may not find the information about this because this organization is a very closed mind group. Please reconsider your decision about deletation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.107.222 (talk) 03:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Deleting my content
Hi you deleted my content? You stated that this was because it was just my opinion but what I posted was correct facts. I'm sorry if you don't like the facts but they are true. If you can't keep your opinions about the facts to yourself maybe you should not be an administrator.

Thank you and have a great day :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.n.o.n.y.m.o.u.s1010101010 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello, . Here's my comment as a watcher of this talk page. The fact of the matter is that your unreferenced edit is an overt violation of our policies on biographies of living people. Attacking people here on Wikipedia is simply not permitted, so please stop now. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

User:Yakbul avoiding block
An IP has started edit warring the same version on Seljuk Empire as Yakbul's. It would appear this is Yakbul avoiding his block. Would you be interested in protecting the Seljuk Empire article? The IP is also edit warring over numerous articles. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm going to watch it for now and protect if problems reoccur. It looks like a lot of the other articles have been protected already, and I think NeilN blocked the anon. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Lil snupe
What did you do to everything? Wikizach0331 (talk) 21:09, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Lil Snupe
You deleted everything i put. Why? Wikizach0331 (talk) 21:18, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The consensus of two recent discussions here and here was that he is insufficiently notable for a standalone article, and it should be converted to a redirect. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho


MarnetteD&#124;Talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.


 * Make sure to click on both pictures to see them full size Bongwarrior as they will give you a chuckle. May your 2016 be full of joy and special times. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 03:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Bongwarrior: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 18:30, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Season's Greetings
To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

protecting
I am not sure if this is allowed for BLP's so just throwing out a request here instead of the noticeboard. Can Both Trump's be semi-protected until the election is over? They seem to be getting a high level of vandalism lately. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Donald's article is already semiprotected indefinitely. Ivanka's will need to be watched and probably protected a few more times, but it probably won't be bad enough to require protection all the way through the election, in my opinion. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Requested talk page access removal
I suggest to disable User:184.151.190.79 talk page access since we don't want him to pull one of these stunts again on his talk page. Dat GuyTalkContribs 19:00, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't think they are bothering with that - they're just moving on to the next IP. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Patrick Slattery
Hello. I see you deleted Patrick Slattery's page. Do you remember what it looked like? I think he should have his own article. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 05:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * It was just a nonsense page that someone wrote about their friend. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there a way to see the content? I think he should have an article as a self-described anti-Confederate activist.Zigzig20s (talk) 07:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The deleted article was undoubtedly about a different Patrick Slattery, and it shouldn't make you hesitant about creating a new article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * OK. I'll see if I can find sufficient third-party references first though...Zigzig20s (talk) 08:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks mate for fixing UFC 195
I'm over people vandalizing this page but thanks dude for fixing it Wwemeowmeow (talk) 01:55, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Puppies getting stabbed in the eyes
Sorry. I went to tag Puppies getting stabbed in the eyes while it was still there, and by the time I added  you had already deleted the page, and it wound up being re-created. Can you re-delete it? --Ira Goldstein (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem, I figured that was it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --Ira Goldstein (talk) 21:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

That quote
Like that quote on your user page, so I shamelessly copied it to my ? page. North America1000 13:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Michael Scott was a wise man. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:24, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

List of supercentenarians who died in 2012
This article you deleted, List of supercentenarians who died in 2012, could you get me a copy of the content before it was deleted? Thanks. —  AMK152  (t • c) 21:40, 11 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The version I deleted was empty, but there was content in the version before that (the one that was deleted after the AfD discussion). I'll be happy to provide that one if that's what you're looking for; just let me know if you want me to email it or make it a subpage in your userspace. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yeah, the most recent content version prior to deletion. You can e-mail it to andrewkolstee@gmail.com —  AMK152  (t • c) 05:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem, done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your request that you didn't request
I added this to Template:UAA when I saw your comment on one of the UAA reports. Hope you like it, Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Good idea, thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Protection level on Danielle Campbell
The article is still being hit with non-RS BLP additions. Would changing PP to PC be more useful? At least one confirmed user is bypassing the PP and is able to add the "supposed" additions.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  04:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's my bad. I didn't notice that one of the users was autoconfirmed when I protected it. Semi and pending changes are both the same level, so that wouldn't really help. It would probably be best to wait and see if the one editor either stops or earns a block. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Ewoks
My edit to the Ewok page was factual. I was going to add a source later. Please fix it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logicalguy101 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

That page 'Danisawesome' you deleted two days ago
Yes, thanks for that! Apparently it was created by a Stanford lecturer for a demonstration to his students...

See here and here. Blythwood (talk) 08:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info. At least it wasn't from someone who was trying to "prove" Wikipedia doesn't work. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Descrimination
I'm reporting you for discrimination. I find your attitude towards start-up musicians and those that associate with them appalling. You cannot delete someone's page just because you may not be a personal fan of their music or of the genre they declare themselves a part of. I know my rights, and I know you are violating them. 108.29.24.212 (talk) 03:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC) Katie O'Bryn, protector of god-given human rights


 * I don't think you get what "rights" are, you don't have the right to have your band in an encyclopedia that is for sure. HighInBC 03:44, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You might want to give the notability guidelines for musicians a read. Nobody's violating your rights, nobody is entitled to inclusion in a global encyclopedia.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Pot Stew Drew
Hello can I ask why you deleted this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pot_Stew_Drew ? I know it may have been rough but I was saving it to switch editors and to have it in case my computer crashed, I wasn't finished flushing it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potstewfan (talk • contribs) 02:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * He isn't notable, and most/all of the article appears to have been made up. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

He is actually notable. Hes famous in the New York City Jazz and Folk scene. He invented a new genre and if you ask anybody at any club on the Lower East side of Manhattan if they've heard of him they'll say yes. He just makes no effort to put himself on social media because he can draw fans with his music alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potstewfan (talk • contribs) 02:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I'll be sure to ask around the next time I'm in Manhattan. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:47, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

With all due respect I think you're being unreasonable. The article I posted was meant to introduce people to a niche style of music. However, you seem close minded to the idea of the Manhattan village scene and you are being very snarky about it. Just because you are uneducated about this specific topic doesn't mean it isn't important in our society. In fact isn't that the purpose of this wonderful website? To enlighten people and help them learn thing they didn't know? I hope you can open your mind and learn to learn new things. There is a lot I can teach you about Pot Stew Drew believe me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potstewfan (talk • contribs) 04:00, 26 January 2016‎


 * Actually the purpose of this wonderful website is to create an encyclopedia. It is not to document every thing out there, just that which can be demonstrated to be notable. HighInBC 04:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Seriously now, enough is enough. Wikipedia is chock-full of various bands, people and things I don't care about. I don't go around deleting those articles as well because most of those things actually exist and can be proven to have made at least some impact, however minor, and they don't need to resort to creating articles consisting of lies and silliness in a misguided effort to promote themselves or their friends. We can't have an article on "Pot Stew Drew" for the same reason we can't have articles on Pink Leprechaun Fairies or Magic Levitating Cheeseburgers. I am sorry we can't agree on this, but your indignation is wasted on me. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Pot Stew Drew
Hello, I personally become a very big pot stew drew fan after I saw him performing in a jazz bar in the East Village. I was so pleased to see him finally gaining some traction with his Wikipedia page, which has now been unfortunately deleted. Frankly I find deleting his page a heinous action and unfair to all struggling musicians out there like him. Please correct this injustice and give him the ability to promote himself- a basic american right!! Looking forward to reestablishment of Pot Stew Drew page, 108.29.24.212 (talk) 03:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Katie O'Byrn


 * Thank you for your interest in Wikipedia, but that has zero chance of happening. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Bongwarrior, You are being extremely inconsiderate here. You are ruining the chance of a struggling artist -- who happens to be very popular in the NYC Jazz Folk circle – to gain the popularity he deserves through the site Wikipedia, a site that is made FOR the people BY the people. Please reconsider and think about others involved, such as Pot Stu himself. And secondly, who are you to judge in the first place? To my knowledge, you are no expert in the Jazz Folk music industry. 108.29.24.212 (talk) 03:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC) Katie O'Byrn, Jazz Folk enthusiast


 * I'll have you know that I have two master's degrees in jazz folk music (one from Harvard and one from Cornell), I am distantly related to Bob Dylan, Pete Seeger and (via marriage) Dizzy Gillespie, and I have produced several albums by some of the world's most renowned jazz folk performers. So, not to brag or anything, but yeah. I'm don't know if I'd consider myself an "expert", but I'm definitely no jazz folk virgin. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

166.173.251.120
You may want to extend the ban - continues to vandal its talk page.--Cahk (talk) 09:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, looks like it has already been handled. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Stop trying to control me!
I'm just here giving people what they want. More Washington to go around. Now let me be! Voteyesforbiggerwashington (talk) 10:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Oops
Apologies for missing the what you were getting at here. I am filing to officially have my middle named changed to "Slow on the uptake" :-) At least Cyberbot 1 made the same mistake. Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 01:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Not at all - you were trying to be helpful while I was trying to be a smartass. I hope you and the IP will forgive my tomfoolery. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Happily on my part. Best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 03:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * A question just occurred to me. Do you need to go back and change your post? I am wondering if the bot will consider it an open request and, thus, not archive it. I don't know all the ins and outs of how those things work so I thought I had better ask. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 03:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I was wondering that also. I don't know the answer for sure, but I suspect it won't archive. I've marked it "not done" for the bot. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Sock of Sheds thus guys argh g ugh b
I have a suspicious feeling User:D11oq is a sock of our well-beloved friend Sheds thus guys argh g ugh b.--Cahk (talk) 07:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure. The behavior seems slightly different, but that might be my imagination. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Shannon Noll
Listen here mate, i don't know who you think you are BUTTTT! i was just casually editing the page of the Aussie legend Shannon Noll and how he had been ROBBED by Guy Sebastian! i think you need to go back to 2003 and to get into your little head that Shannon Noll was ROBBED! HE WAS ROBBED I TELL YOU.... you are a disgrace to all of Australia. Peace out

Sincerely

ThatGayKid — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatGayKid9999 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

User: DEATH TO THE WHITES DEATH TO AMERICA
Thank you. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  05:09, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Aww come on
They may not have been constructive edits, but have you ever watched the show? They were deserved edits. Jolly137 (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's terrible, but we still have to be a neutral and accurate source of information. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your name
What's up with your name? Do you like bongs? Are you really high right now? Is that why your deleting my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjm3.556 (talk • contribs) 02:05, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Nothing, yes, no, no. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:10, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Tower of London
Thanks very much for this. That article has been getting a bit too busy lately and I've tried requesting PC in the hope that it might help. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 10:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Probably not a bad idea, done. --Bongwarrior (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Lovely, thanks very much. It will be nice to have a slow-down there. DBaK (talk) 10:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous
I've given the everspawning troll a break from editing Reference desk/Miscellaneous. Sprotecting pages such as this isn't something I normally do, and right now I'm trying to concentrate on paid work rather read up on hazily remembered areas of WP policy. If you'd like to change the time (now 3 hours), unprotect or whatever, please feel free to do so: no need to get my OK. -- Hoary (talk) 06:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * You actually made it indefinite, not three hours. But that's perfectly okay - three hours won't be nearly long enough. Better to leave it indef for now, then we can unprotect whenever. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I did? Well well, I must be tireder/pissedoffer than I'd realized. -- Hoary (talk) 06:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi protect request
Hey Bongwarrior. I see you are an admin. Could Anderson Varejão please be semi protected. There has been an overload of anon edits recently adding poorly sourced or unsourced content to the article. Cheers. DaHuzyBru (talk) 07:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Yakbul
Since you were the admin that indef'd user:Yakbul, you might want to be aware of IPs130.88.99.223130.88.99.219130.88.99.230, that geolocate back to University of Manchester, are making the same edits as Yakbul on the Xiongnu article. Judging from the IPs edits on Xiongnu and Seljuk Empire, I believe this is Yakbul continuing his edit warring/disruptive editing while logged out. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - sorry about the accidental deletion of this edit, Finger trouble, not aiming here at all! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I've increased the protection level from pending changes to semiprotection. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!
For this. I'm really skeptical about the misuse of rollback by so many editors. Cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I was just getting ready to thank you. So thank you, and sorry about everything. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:45, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Good catch
Good catch on that protection date. It's been a long day, thanks! SQL <sup style="font-size: 5pt;color:#999">Query me! 00:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem at all, that's why they pay me the big bucks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Wrongly accused
You seem to have undone something that I wrote on the Tyler Oakley page because I said him and I were friends. I just won't to say I have met Tyler and he did say that we are best friends Toby breeze (talk) 21:45, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I have no doubt you are the best of friends. But we can't add anything like that without proof, and even then it would be pretty trivial. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Unconstructive username
This username does not appear constructive. As he reverted your edit, I have reported to you. Abel Lawrence (talk) 04:48, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you, it has been handled by someone else. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Zo National Region Development Party
Hello, How are you? I don't understand, Why it is unless Article?

You can delete this --95.151.44.186 (talk) 01:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Good, thanks. I've deleted the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. :) --95.151.44.186 (talk) 02:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Recent death tag
Maybe you should reconsider this, given that there's been 67 edits since then? 81.108.18.234 (talk) 23:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * See Template:Recent death/doc. The template is appropriate when there are perhaps hundreds of edits being performed in a single day, making editing difficult because of edit conflicts, and/or when there is conflicting information being reported about the circumstances of death.  Neither is the case here. <span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;"><font color="#006633">General Ization  <font color="#000666">Talk   23:06, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry
Sorry, I just thought that Donald Trump cheated while playing golf. Am I supposed do use facts only or can I give opinions?

-Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenryV72 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Only facts, and only if they can be backed up by a reliable source. Please and thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your name, Bongwarrior
Do you smoke weed? Because a "Bong" as in "Bongwarrior" is used to smoke weed. That is inappropriate. I really want to know. This isn't a joke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenryV72 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Tower of London
Maybe I'm too late to request renewal of the protection. There has been still vandalism. Reinitiate it? --George Ho (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * It doesn't look too bad right now, but I'll keep an eye on it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 09:28, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

The user you just blocked
I have just logged into my account and some pages on my watchlist were vandalized by some user (F***C*** supreme). Is it possible to open another SPI with CU and/or lock the account globally due to the offensive username? Furthermore, it appears to be a sockpuppet of User:Supreme Genghis Khan so maybe you wanna tag it? TheCoffeeAddict  talk &#124; contribs  07:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * You can if you'd like - I don't usually bother with any of that. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * For the record, a steward has globally locked most of the other sockpuppets as well as the obscene usernamed person (they are all sockpuppets of Supreme Genghis Khan) TheCoffeeAddict   talk &#124; contribs  13:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

About the Page Mumtaz Qadri
Hi. Can you please make the semi-protection status indefinite or permanent? It is being constantly vandalized. Thank you. --113.203.192.234 (talk) 20:51, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I've increased it to two months. I think it's too early to say it will need to be protected permanently, but the first protection was for two weeks, so mine should have been longer. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I guess. --113.203.192.234 (talk) 20:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Urgent request
Sorry to bother you but can you please take care of ? It's a Mangoeater1000 sock. Already did spi and aiv, but seems few admins are on tonight and he's getting abusing in the edit summaries.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 04:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * just took care of it. Thank you!  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 05:02, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Request to reopen Josh Stimpson article
Please can you unlock the Josh Stimpson article so i can improve it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monster2847 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't think the article's overriding issue, the subject's distinct lack of notability, can be fixed. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

AfD
Hi : A recent edit you performed at AfD has been reverted. You may want to check it out. North America1000 03:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Yeah, you got me. Happy AfD. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
07:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Senergyoni

Dongers
How could you suppress the almighty glory of dongers? Why?... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whyareyouyru (talk • contribs) 21:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)


 * It didn't seem particularly glorious. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Odd
This is unexpected. I don't know if there's anything that needs to be done about it, but I thought you might like to know. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:51, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, he's been doing that for a while now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Requesting a lot of RevDel at Sandbox
I might be periodically updating this, but we have IPs vandalizing the sandbox with obscene images.
 * Special:Contributions/37.208.239.236
 * Special:Contributions/5.187.254.225
 * Special:Contributions/41.213.245.180
 * Special:Contributions/82.116.71.54
 * Unfortunately includes Special:Diff/714146864 (an accidental reversion on my part)
 * Special:Contributions/90.3.170.139 on my talk page

&mdash; Andy W. (talk · contrib) 22:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I tried it and I'm getting a database error. Something is apparently broken somewhere, so I'll try it again later. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Impostor
Thanks for not blocking me and deleting my pages by mistake! I have no doubt that was what he was intending. Adam9007 (talk) 00:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * No problem, I'm glad I didn't. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, I just realized I didn't know how to spell "impostor". I though my Firefox spellchecker was on the fritz. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I only hope people don't look at the similar usernames and think he's me. Is there some way it can be made clear that I'm not him? I'm thinking of sending messages to editors who know me to alert them. Adam9007 (talk) 00:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure. I wonder if that might be a good idea for a template? Something to put on an impersonator's user page or talk page that says, basically, "this account was only created to impersonate and/or troll, there's no connection to the real user." Although I think most people would be able to figure that out anyway, it probably wouldn't hurt. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Bingo!:

Template:Blocked impersonator

Shall I use this on the impostor's talk page? Adam9007 (talk) 01:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I had no idea that existed. I say go for it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. Though I still think it's a good idea to alert people in case he tries it again. Adam9007 (talk) 01:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

WP:Sandbox
You need to REVDEL the edit summary of 21:44, 9 April 2016‎ 2601:ca:8102:3ea0:a8f7:6ae9:7d57:ba5b (talk)‎. . (29 bytes) (-411)‎. . (←Replaced content with '900px') <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 02:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, it slipped through. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Our Sandbox got some help

 * Thanks, piece o' cake. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, always happy to help out. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:14, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

For you

 * Thanks! --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for helping me with vandal User:Steve likes it silly. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 18:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
For cleaning up vandalism.

ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2016 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>


 * It looks delicious! My boa constrictor thanks you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for blocking User:Steve likes it silly, it was getting ridiculous. JumpiMaus (talk) 18:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * No problemo. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for blocking that vandal. Continuous edit warring (knowing that I was the right one in this case) was especially exhausting! 3primetime3 (talk) 01:00, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Did you want your talk page protected? --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Even though I'm really tempted to, I should. Some anons do leave me legitimate messages about my mistakes.  If I accidentally revert a good edit, they have no way of notifying me.  But I cri every time I see some weird pictures on my page :P.  3primetime3 (talk) 01:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * They keep coming. It would be great if you could keep an eye out for these proxies by blocking them :)


 * They usually do. Most times, the only solution is to protect the sandboxes for a little while, which isn't a good solution. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Thijn23
Can you please block him/her? Because he/she involved unsourced genre as did on Fearless (Taylor Swift album) and Speak Now (though I reverted them) 115.164.221.11 (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I'd like to help, but I'm really not interested. I don't really deal with genre warring, although I know it can be a big pain. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hemp
Hello, could you as an administrator please have a look here and help out, thanks. HempFan (talk) 20:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I can't look right now, but I'll check it out later. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:05, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


 * It looks like this has been resolved and moved back to Hemp, which I agree with. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Article "List of fastest production cars by acceleration"
Hi,

I have recently been working on "List of fastest production cars by acceleration" and notice you had given it move-protection. I was wondering if the protection level could be reduced, at least temporarily. The page has grown in scope and has not seen major issues. I would really appreciate being able to move it with my account. If any problems occur it could be again protected.

Thanks,

Alex

Altanner1991 (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Surely. That was a few years old, and I don't expect the issues that prompted me to protect it in the first place to be an issue going forward. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Unfortunately I did not realize the talk page was protected by The Bushranger. I have left a message although it seems the user is less active... If you are able to change the protection level of the talk page as well that would be great. Thanks again Altanner1991 (talk) 01:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Fresh off an unblock
Bongwarrior,

I noticed you recently blocked this I.P address for vandalism. Looks they didn't learn. About two weeks after they were unblocked they | added this BLP violating gem on the page of Marc Mezvinsky. I gave them a level 4 warning, considering they were fairly fresh off a block, perhaps they need a longer block ? Kosh Vorlon  16:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * There was a three week gap, so it's not like they came back right after the block expired. It was fairly recent, so there's no problem with a level 4, but I think we're fine to leave it at that. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Request to Protect the Page Mumtaz Qadri
Hi. The page Mumtaz Qadri was vandalised again. I reverted it but can you can protect it once more? Thanks.--113.203.188.243 (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll keep an eye on it - I'd like to give the unprotection more of a chance to either work or not work before re-protecting. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

OK. --113.203.221.222 (talk) 03:05, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, as you thought, it wasn't really working. I've semiprotected it for another four months. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Suggested Vandalism
I received a message from you saying my edits to a certain page had been undone for being non-constructive, but I can promise that I have never visited that page, let alone made any edits to it. I think you may have the wrong person. 169.231.17.223 (talk) 20:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I believe you - someone else probably had that IP address before you did. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Block request
Vodkapoise is up to his tricks again. - Brianhe (talk) 05:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

deletion
plz put the page scallywag05 back up because it is informational and everyone is special and important, you cannot say someone is not special or significant because you are being mean. he is a youtuber and that makes him amazing so please fix wikipedia and put it back up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scallywag05yt (talk • contribs) 06:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Not trying to be mean, and I'm not saying he isn't special, but not everyone who uploads videos to YouTube needs an article. Without reliable and independent information about the subject, there can be no article because there's nothing to say that can be verified. That applies to YouTubers, musicians, plants, companies, you name it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:04, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * it is 100% true go watch his channel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.113.126 (talk) 00:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * you can verify it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.113.92.198 (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The main concern here is notability - there are lots of YouTube channels out there. About 99.999 percent of them don't have articles. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Wow
... some people just can't grow up and let go, can they? - A l is o n  ❤ 21:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protect?
Hi, could you semi-protect America's Got Talent (season 11)? Thanks Hawkeye75 (talk) 07:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

can you help?
i have no idea how this works, i've opened up articles for deleiton before but this isnt getting any comments or attention at all and it's been up for two days Second Skin (talk) 21:17, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Everything looks fine from here. My first thought was that you might have forgotten to add it to the daily AfD log, but you did that. AfD in general doesn't always get the turnout that it used to. If it doesn't get much attention before the seven days are up, it will probably be relisted for another week. It will still work, it just takes longer that way. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Oh, well thank you for having the patience to explain it. I've just seen the AfD debates had a whole lot more comments on other articles up for deletion and this one wasn't getting much attention from others for what didn't seem to be a reason obvious to me. Second Skin (talk) 01:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Famous in Love
Thank you! Cheers, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Happy to help. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)