User talk:Bonhamme/sandbox

You've done quite a bit, this is very impressive! Almost as large as the original article. I don't think I have any specific things to suggest, keep going! Abirch123 (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Peer review
Overall, the format and outline you have here look like great contributions to add to this topic. I think the way you broke the sections down helps the reader grasp exactly what goes into such a dense, interconnected topic of Ethical Archaeology. I like that you added imperialism to the nationalism section. This presents the reader with a more conclusive understanding of possible implications when excavations are done for the sake of personal and private interests. You present the information with neutrality and balance for example by adding ethnics of Ethno-Archaeology and ethics in commercial Archaeology!It may be insightful to add case studies showing some examples of ethical and unethical Ethno-Archaeology. This could make the information easier to process by non anthropology students. You could also link western and non western in the legislation across the world section because  those are broad concepts. Great job so far! (Jassphill (talk) 05:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC))

Hi Megan et al. You have done a nice bit of work here, and I appreciate the revamp you are suggesting. You all might also reach out to the other student editors working on this at the moment (I'll admit I have no idea who they are). One thing to make clear as you proceed is why you are making some of the organizational changes you are making, particularly if you are cutting out some material or folding it into other places (for instance with the human remains portion of the existing article). I'd also encourage you to make sure that the ethnoarchaeology section is above the external links, and I might retitle the history section "History of Ethics in Archaeology." But I'll be interested to see how this looks as you flesh it out! MP  Bwana Msitu (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)