User talk:Bonini42

Welcome to Wikipedia. However, may I suggest some revision to Clutha Vets? It's not really complying with the Neutral Point of View Policy. Use of words like 'our' say 'written by' rather than 'written about', which is what an encyclopaedia is all about. I would normally flag for spam on seeing wording like this, but yours is an old organisation and user run rather than purely commercial (if I've read it right!), so I'm making this suggestion first. Peridon (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Clutha vets
I have deleted this article, since it was a direct copy of the Clutha vets web site, and therefore a copyright violation. I realise that you might also own the rights to that website, and it would be possible for the copyright issue to be resolved by your putting a GFDL licence on the website, but there is also the issue of whether the organisation is sufficiently notable to have an article on Wikipedia.

The general guidelines on what makes an organisation notable are at Notability (organizations and companies). As far as I am aware, no other New Zealand vetinary service has such an article. I suggest that you not endeavour to rewrite the article, as someone else is likely to delete it again, but that your contributions to Wikipedia might be more valuable in expanding existing articles, such as Clutha District, or Royal New Zealand Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. It might also be interesting and useful to have articles on Vetinary services in New Zealand (such as Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand does, see ) and Vet clubs.- gadfium 20:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)