User talk:Bonnie Cheuk

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Bonnie Cheuk. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Sensemaking, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 17:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Bonnie - if you want some help navigating the whole COI question let me know. I've been through it and I'll happily talk you through the issues -Snowded TALK 23:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Apology
Hi Bonnie, it has been suggested to me that my comments about your additions of references to Dervin in the sensemaking article might be taken as dismissive. I want to assure you that that is not my intention. My view is that your contributions may belong in the other article (Sensemaking (information science)) but that Dervin is not part of the tradition of work on "sensemaking" in the sense defined by this article. I have not been able to find a piece of scholarship in that (Weickian) tradition that also makes substantial use of Dervin's work. But if you know of such work, I agree that it should be included, perhaps in a section that notes the collaboration across these two disciplines (organization studies and information science). In any case, once again, I was sorry to hear that you might have taken offense and I wanted to assure you that none was intended.--Thomas B (talk) 08:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)