User talk:Boochengen

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:52, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:58, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Social Issues in Cambodia has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 16:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Social Issues in Cambodia


The article Social Issues in Cambodia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a well-written or verified article that resembles an essay. The topic might be notable, but not in this way: too argumentative.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Boochengen, it seemed to me that you wanted the article deleted when you blanked it. This was reverted; I assume because there are some edits to the article by another editor, User talk:Ec3351projectgroup. If they hadn't made those edits, your blanking could have been interpreted as "author blanking", in which case the article could have been deleted. I have prodded it for deletion believing that you wanted it to be deleted--if not, you are free to remove the PROD tag and improve the article (for it does need some improvement). Don't pay much attention to the "vandalism" warnings above; I don't think your blanking was really vandalism. Let me know if I can help. Drmies (talk) 16:35, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of NGOs in Cambodia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NGOs in Cambodia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NGOs in Cambodia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Social Issues in Cambodia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social Issues in Cambodia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Social Issues in Cambodia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)