User talk:Boofalo7

Speedy deletion of Nyimpine Chode
A tag has been placed on Nyimpine Chode requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KnightLago (talk) 20:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- Kinu t /c  20:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Kinu t /c  20:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

January 2008
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 23:33, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 23:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The General in His Labyrinth has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. SJP (talk) 12:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)