User talk:Booger-mike

December 2018
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Luigi. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. JDDJS ( talk to me  •  see what I've done ) 00:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Luigi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The1337gamer (talk) 22:39, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mater (Cars), you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 15:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Talk:Jack_the_Giant_Killer. I honestly don't know why you are making nonconstructive comments Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 02:37, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Important Message
I honestly don't know why you make such redundant edits. I'm not trying to be mean or anything but please do us a favor and ask for help and advice for editing here, or edit uncyclopedia instead, your edits will be far more appreciated there.--Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 02:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Okay, thank you User:Booger-mike 8:42 PM (EDT) October 15, 2019

Talk pages
Hi there, Booger-mike. I've reverted the bulk of your recent edits, as most of them appear to be random commentary on article talk pages. Talk pages are for discussing specific changes and improvements to articles, not for general discussion about a subject, ruminations, jokes, editorials, musings, rhetorical questions, blah blah blah. A strong majority of your talk page comments have not been consistent with our expectations. (for example.) If you want to chat about random topics, please find a better forum like a discussion board or something. Any more pointless talk page comments or unsourced edits like will result in your editing privileges being interrupted. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Re, see above. Thanks. - LuckyLouie (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Snow White, you may be blocked from editing. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 00:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Solaris
I have added an image of Solaris.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 06:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Booger-mike (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Disney Fairies. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:34, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Seconding this. It looks like you technically violated this again 5 days after this warning, but that was a month ago, so I’ll hold off this time. That says, the amount of warnings and examples of bad talk page comments is very concerning. Any more, and you’re blocked. If you have any confusion on the matter, read up on WP:NOTAFORUM. Thanks. Sergecross73   msg me  01:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I seriously have no idea what you're talking about. Booger-mike (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * This edit right here, the only one you've ever made on the page. It was from from over a year ago, but so was my warning about it. You're literally a year late on responding to this. Sergecross73   msg me  15:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

How is that inappropriate? I was asking a question! Booger-mike (talk) 01:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The talk page is for discussing the article itself. So any questions you ask need to be about altering, adding, or removing content from the article. Don't ask questions like "I wonder why "x" is like this?". It sounds like you're just asking random questions about the subject itself. Frame it so you're asking about the article yourself. So, like "Do reliable sources mention why "x" happens, and should it be mentioned in the article?" Sergecross73   msg me  14:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bizarro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clone. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)