User talk:Bookkeeperoftheoccult

Barbara Gordon / "Sexiest Women in Comics"
Hey there. The "Sexiest Women" item/"Reception" section that you just edited (thank you) is one of several I've created today to try to correct over-prominence of this factoid which appeared in the Intro/Lead sections for 32 female superheroes. We 100% agree that this bit of trivia doesn't merit its own Reception section. I think in many cases it doesn't merit any inclusion at all in these articles, but discussion here convinced me that deleting these rankings from articles would catalyze reverts. Moving the information to a "Reception" section was my best effort to address even-more-undeserved emphasis in the prior iterations of the articles. If you have the knowledge and inclination to make similar improvements to some of my other edits, please do! A full list of the superhero pages I edited today is in my contributions page.--GDswamp (talk) 20:15, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

American Horror Story (season 6)
Would you mind submitting your opinion on | the latest proposal to the "Cast and Characters" section. LLArrow (talk) 23:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Request for 5 minute survey
Hi! I'm a researcher from the University of Minnesota conducting a study on LGBT user contributions to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short five minute survey? If so, I would appreciate if you could drop me an email at leung085@umn.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 23:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

... and five --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

... and six --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
'''Wishing Bookkeeperoftheoccult a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Janetrollingstonecover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Janetrollingstonecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Janet-Jackson-Dammn-Baby-2016.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Janet-Jackson-Dammn-Baby-2016.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Possibility of providing your input on a Peer Review for Regine Velasquez's entry
Hi ,

I'm writing to ask whether you would consider having a look at the article. I'm aware that you've been involved with a few PRs before. I've given it a major rewrite and complete overhaul. I began working on the article late October when it looked like this and somehow ended up rewriting the whole thing and aiming for potentially FA. This isn't a process I've been through before, but I have been reading the reviews here in preparation, and am familiar with FAC demands. I would very much appreciate a fresh set of eyes and happily address any concerns you may have.

Thanks! Pseud 14 (talk) 13:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Barbara Gorden/Batgirl
Hi. I am going through old GAs with clean up tags. These two articles (Barbara Gordon and Batgirl have the same tag on them. I do feel they fail the {{WP:GACR|focus criteria]], Gordan has 70KB readable prose as well so is very long for a fictional character. I just wanted to draw your attention to them, with the hope you may be able to fix them. The rest of the articles looks very nice. AIRcorn (talk) 04:52, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Batwoman
Batwoman, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 23:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Madefornowcover.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Janet Jackson EP
Just wanted to chime in and let you know that Harmony Samuels mentioned the EP in the fall at these two sources and Janet herself states in an interview with iHeartRadio that "Made for Now" is the first single off a small project coming this fall. It's not a full-length album.Partyclams (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Animatedbatwoman.png
Thanks for uploading File:Animatedbatwoman.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Janetrollingstonecover.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janetrollingstonecover.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ə XPLICIT 23:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Supergirl v4 1.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Supergirl v4 1.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:57, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Happy Birthday! Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alternative versions of Barbara Gordon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternative versions of Barbara Gordon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Barbara Gordon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jontesta (talk) 20:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Alternative versions of Supergirl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternative versions of Supergirl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Supergirl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 22:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:All Star Batman and Robin 3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:All Star Batman and Robin 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thrillkiller.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Thrillkiller.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

"All for You (Álbum Janet Jackson)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect All for You (Álbum Janet Jackson). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC  678  02:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021 .--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

It's Been a While....
It is good to see you are still active. I am hoping to return one day - though I am sure much has changed. Keep fighting the good fight :)

--— R  2  14:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Janet Jackson as a gay icon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Janet Jackson as a gay icon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Madonna as a gay icon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
 Happy Birthday! Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, DC &#124; Thank you (talk) 07:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Wishing Bookkeeperoftheoccult a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Guardian article cited 11 years ago
It's been a long time, but can you remember what source you were tapping when you added this 1993 Guardian review by Caroline Sullivan? I have been trying and failing to find it online. The Guardian lists Sullivan's works back to 1995, not 1993. Is it possible you were looking at a reprint at janetjackson.com? I know that website has hosted reviews of Janet's works in the past. Or was it rocksbackpages.com? The latter has some Sullivan writings from 1993 but not about Janet. Binksternet (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Janet Jackson &#38; Justin Timberlake&#39;s wardrobe malfunction.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janet Jackson &, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

File:JanetUnbreakableSingle.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JanetUnbreakableSingle.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 00:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Batgirl
Batgirl has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:51, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Barbara Gordon
Barbara Gordon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien ( talk ) 01:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)