User talk:BooksForLife-Adam

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 16)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:BooksForLife-Adam/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Advertising.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BooksForLife-Adam/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:BooksForLife-Adam/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.ereaderiq.com/author/Linda+Hill/ and https://www.amazon.com/Gaslighting-Identifying-Manipulation-Emotional-Relationships-ebook/dp/B09W9RVCXY?ref_=ast_author_dp. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
 * It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed |1= I am writing an author biography and not to promote. I can delete the links for books if this will be unblocked.BooksForLife-Adam (talk)

Your content was blatantly promotional. If your only goal here is to write about that author, this is the end of the line. You will not be unblocked to do that. If instead you wish to write about subject areas for which you have no conflict of interest, tell us what you plan to write about instead and convince us you understand why your contributions were blatantly inappropriate. --Yamla (talk) 12:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)