User talk:Booksmart80

July 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Malcolm Mejin. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Malcolm Mejin, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:28, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 02:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

References for Vanitee Bee
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vanitee Bee


The article Vanitee Bee has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Recently created unreferenced book article claims to it sold "a staggering one million copies." Those kinds of claims need sources, which shouldn't be hard to find, if they're true, but there's nothing like that in google (I don't read malay though)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC)