User talk:Bookuser

MIT Press books
Please read WP:COI, WP:EL, and WP:SPAM concerning your repeated additions of MIT Press books and http://mitpress.mit.edu links to articles. Thanks. --Ronz 19:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

I've asked for help in addressing the issues I mentioned above:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard. --Ronz 19:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a commecrial advertising or networking service. Bearian 01:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I noticed you have gone back through your past edits and removed any remaining links to mitpress.mit.edu that you added. Very commendable! I encourage you to comment at Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard about your perspective. -- Ronz 20:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

One last thing, hopefully. You sometimes make MIT Press and Semiotext(e) into internal links. While this is fine for the first instance, it's inappropriate to link every one in the same article. I don't think you need to go back and remove them though. See my discussion with a much more experienced editor about it: User_talk:Athaenara. -- Ronz 00:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Boston article
Hi Bookuser, I was curious if you intended to delete, or only move, the book you deleted on the article Boston. CApitol3 17:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

-hi, i meant to delete it. as i mentioned in the note, it should have been in a 'further reading' section rather than a 'reference' section. i'd accidentally added this a while back into the references section. since Boston doesn't have a further reading section, i thought it'd be better to just remove it. thanks Bookuser 19:35, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)