User talk:Bookwork72

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Cow Vodka (March 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Cow Vodka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  13:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Cow Vodka has been accepted
 Black Cow Vodka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Bookwork72, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Black Cow Vodka have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bob Moran
Hello Bookwork72,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bob Moran for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi. Unfortunately, I had to delete this article because the content of it was copied from here. You can read why here. Please feel free to recreate the article using original content. Apologies and all the best, --Tóraí (talk) 23:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Bob Moran
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Bookwork72, thanks for creating Bob Moran!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has no categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bob Moran


The article Bob Moran has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't meet WP:JOURNALIST or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 10:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

(Bookwork72 (talk) 07:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)) Hi Boleyn - other cartoonists of a similar level have their own article, so thought it would be ok? See example, here: Morten Morland

Hi, Bookwork72, if you disagree with the prod, you can remove it, and have a full discussion instead at AfD. Other stuff exists, but the question is how does this journalist meet WP:JOURNALIST or WP:GNG? I couldn't verify that. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 10:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

File:3TomMoran190424.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:3TomMoran190424.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)