User talk:Boolean lint

Me, Harlz123, and my partner, Rhobday30 are interested in expanding or creating a page for Delaware v. Prouse, California v. Carney, Pennsylvania v. Finley, Holden v. Hardy, Whitus v. Georgia, and United States v. Dionisio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harlz123 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

The list my partner, samrienzi,and I, Dorakr85, came up with is Island Trees Schools v. Pico, Tinker v. Des Moines Independant Community School District, and Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC.

Hi! I answered your question here: http://ask.wikiedu.org/question/284/is-there-a-way-to-assign-groups-so-that-i-can-see-them-in-the-dashboard/

--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)


 * We (Fredjl00) and I, are not sure if this is the right place to post this, but some of our ideas for the project are FTC v. Vemma, or creating a page on the case Stormans, Inc. v. (various members of the Washington's dept. of health, and also maybe Maher v. Roe.

SunflowerME113 (talk) 22:17, 18 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Owl_1001, Daler21, and TomBrady666 came up with a list of potential topics to edit for wikipedia. One topic had an under developed page and the others did not have an existing page available. Roberts v. City of Boston has an under developed page. State v. Buzzard, Bakeshop Act of 1895, Clark v. Board of School Directors, and Taylor. Porter and Ford did not have existing pages. Our group believes these pages would be interesting to develop further for the Wikipedia Encyclopedia.

Owl 1001 (talk) 20:27, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Maykay343 (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)maykay343 and Maykay343 (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2015 Maykay343 (talk) 11:28, 22 October 2015 (UTC) ramim15 (talk)are looking to edit caucusing, anti-patriotism, political suicide, and suffrage atelier. Unsure if we have to edit court cases, so we came up with these topics that are underdeveloped pages. These topics have to do with civil rights and liberties in and of themeselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maykay343 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Blue2433 (talk) 11:49, 20 October 2015 (UTC) madtalksalot, marissanicosia and I we discussed doing our Wiki project on either Zelman v Simmons-Harris, Gideon v Wainwright, or Ogden v Saunders — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.75.126.196 (talk) 15:53, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Miah B (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

I Miah B, thought it would be interesting to see what more I could possibly add to the case pages Whitney v California, Plessy v Ferguson, or create a page for Clark v Board of School Directors. --Miah B (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Mazuj48 (talk) 12:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Mazuj48, Vicco2012, and Bobo695 are interested in discussing issues surrounding the LGBT community specifically focusing on transgender issues, DASA (The Dignity for all Students Act) and prominent court rulings on these topics.

Eagles1234_1 and PoetRogue13 are thinking about discussing any of the topics of Roberts v. City of Boston, Barron v. Baltimore, Clark v. Board of School Directors, Ross v. McIntyre, or United States v. Schwimmer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagles1234 1 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

(Fredjll00) and I (SunflowerME113) have been working on our summary and we put it in my sandbox (can you see it if it's in my sandbox?) Also we have not yet cited it because we are unsure of how to cite government documents. However, we did put the URLS in our sandbox. All of the information we have used has been straight from the court paperwork. After we did this work, we noticed that you mentioned to use a case with a speaking component. we didn't see this until we were ready to post this in each of our sandboxes, unfortunately, but we wondering if what we're doing is ok? SunflowerME113 (talk) 01:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Editing SCOTUS articles
Hi Boolean lint! First and foremost, I want to welcome you to Wikipedia -- it is always exciting to see college professors integrate Wikipedia into their curricula. I also want to touch base with you about writing articles for United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) cases because I noticed that students in your Civil Rights and Liberties class plan to edit articles for SCOTUS cases. I encourage your students to become familiar with MOS:LAW and WP:SCOTUS/SG, which provide style guidelines for SCOTUS articles. Per MOS:LAW, editors are encouraged to use the Bluebook citation style, which is now considered (for better or worse) the de facto lingua franca of American legal citations. Editors are also encouraged to provide inline citations after every sentence that makes an assertion about the holding of a case; these citations should reference the page(s) of the United States Reports (or the case's slip opinion) on which that holding appears (see also WP:CITEDENSE). Please feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions, and I look forward to seeing your class' contributions! Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)