User talk:Boomer Vial/Archive 1

Help with Huggle
Hello, I recently download the Huggle anti-vandalism tool. However, I keep getting an error saying that I don't have the 'rollback permissions on this project'. Is this because I am a new user? Thanks. Boomer Vial (talk) 03:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! - Since Huggle is a very advanced tool (with the ability to cause serious destruction if used improperly) you need to have the rollback permission on the English Wikipedia to use it. This permission is granted to users who have shown they are competent in Wikipedia policies and know how to fight vandalism! You can request rollback permission here, but you would not be accepted at this time. In the mean time, you can consider using your fist to revert any vandalism you see! Let me know if you have any questions! --allthefoxes (Talk) 03:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey, just one other question. Is there any anti-vandalism tools that I can use as a new user, or are they all too advanced? If so, that is fine, I will rely on doing it myself for the time being. Cheers. Boomer Vial (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:TWINKLE is a tool you could use right now! :) However, just remember all changes you make, even with a tool, are your responsibility. Be careful, and I highly suggest you read up on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --allthefoxes (Talk) 03:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you for the response . Cheers. :) Boomer Vial (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Warnings
If you revert someones edit, it is a good idea to give them a warning, if they are a new user! Read about this here --allthefoxes (Talk) 03:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. :) Boomer Vial (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hi, may I suggest that you look at information contained in ref tags. Often these allow you to find the reliable sources for the reliably sourced information added to an article. Have a nice day. 122.56.200.79 (talk) 05:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Autoconfirmed
Hello, I was wondering how a user becomes a 'autoconfirmed' or 'confirmed' user. Thanks. Boomer Vial (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Autoconfirmed happens after a user has 10 contributions within 4 days. SwisterTwister   talk  05:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you SwisterTwister. Cheers. :) Boomer Vial (talk) 05:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Certainly, if you want to familiarize yourself with how Wikipedia works, see WP:Welcome and WP:New contributors' help page. Also, you may ask me any questions at my talk page as well. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey, SwisterTwisted, how do I check if my account has been made confirmed? I still cannot see the Twinkle tool under my preferences. Cheers. Boomer Vial (talk) 06:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It may not have gone through yet (see WP:AUTOCONFIRM). You may also ask for it to be enacted instantly at Requests for permissions/Confirmed. Cheers, SwisterTwister   talk  06:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

just FYI, confirming a user early is almost never done except in cases of legitimate alternate accounts. The reason is that the bar for autoconfirmation is deliberately quite low. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Kali
Why have the edits been removed? Or rather called "vandalism". I've put in the right references and citations to the change. 106.51.233.181 (talk) 06:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 20:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it slipped my mind while typing that up. Boomer Vial (talk) 20:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 20:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Note
Hi Boomer, re this edit, please be aware that a user is allowed to remove almost any kind of warning from their own user talk page: see wp:OWNTALK. There is no need to restore the old warnings. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 19:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, ok. I reverted them partly because of that, and partly because they were (more than likely) bad-edit edits. Thanks for giving me the heads up, though User:DVdm. Cheers. Boomer Vial (talk) 19:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Antivandalism
Hello Boomer Vial, I noticed you are also busy with antivandalism, did you use Twinkle already? There is a script (I use it myself with TW) that lets you put the user warning on a vandals Usertalkpage with one click (you'll still need to copy/paste the vandalised Article's title, though), if you are not already using it I can look the page up for you. Because there are too many people having fun at vandalising :-) Poepkop (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2016 (UTC).
 * Hey, User:Poepkop! Yeah, I'm aware of Twinkle, and I was actually waiting to be auto confirmed so I can use it. Thank you though! Cheers! Boomer Vial (talk) 18:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Boomer Vial, when you are reverting an edit for vandalism, please do provide a reason. 106.51.234.78 (talk) 06:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

re: Kurds in Russia
so sorry an accident. i enjoy coding but am not very good yet, so i wanted to see how the codes worked. i had selected a bunch and then uploaded it to a website to see what it meant. i accidentally pressed backspace and boom. so sorry ==

76.22.208.116 (talk) 14:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Did you give me a barnstar?
An IP which had been vandalizing (business manager claimed it was a public wifi network after I placed a shared IP notice) gave me a barnstar with your signature on it. Was that intentional? BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 18:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 18:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Help me
Hello, I was wondering which board I should post a suggestion of change in policy concerning editing one's talk page? Thanks. Boomer Vial (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You would be looking for the village pump. --allthefoxes (Talk) 19:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, user:Allthefoxes. Cheers! Boomer Vial (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Page creation tutorials?
Hey, I was wondering if there are any tutorials on creating pages on Wikipedia? Thanks. Boomer Vial (talk) 05:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You could try the Article wizard. Dat GuyTalkContribs 06:48, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Cheers. Boomer Vial (talk) 07:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Stirikethroughs
Hey how do I put a strike-through in text? I want to strike out some text that I wrote that has become irrelevant. Boomer Vial (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You add to the start and to the end. Example . Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ahhh, I see. Thank you DatGuy. Cheers. Boomer Vial (talk) 16:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Boomer Vial. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Regards, CoconutPaste (talk) 04:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Mmmmm. Nothing like fresh cookies. :) Thanks, CoconutPaste. Cheers. Boomer Vial (talk) 04:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

kaby lake detail
long story short, the reason I removed some some content was because there is no source support that specification, nor cache or clock speed is proven to be true. however some AMD fanboy from Malaysia tried to be vandalism by editing the article with false information. I will personally apologize for inconvenience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:403:20F0:DDDE:7C1B:B5E3:A440 (talk) 08:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Ohhh, I see. Well, apologies about reverting your edits, and mislabeling them as vandalism. Also, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~). Sinebot will not catch every unsigned edit. Thanks. Boomer Vial (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

aesthetization of violence
The edit I made was to move a paragraph that was in the wrong place. The movie man of fire was mentioned, then the next paragraph goes back to what the previous paragraph was saying about Morales' review of Kill Bill. 67.222.224.69 (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Tim Zukas
Re your warning to Tim Zukas, be aware that this user just recently came off a SIX MONTH suspension for disruptive editing for making similar mass deletions, and also doing so either without or with misleading edit summaries. He also does this via thousands of logged out edits from dozens of anonymous IPs as well. It looks as if he is at it again and he needs close watching. Centpacrr (talk) 12:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I left him a final vandalism warning, and he will be reported if continues to change or remove information without an explanation. Thanks. Boomer VialHolla 18:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Based on my and a raft of other editors' experience with him over several years this won't take long. Mr. Zukas does not change his stripes. See HERE. Centpacrr (talk) 21:12, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've re-blocked him indef. SQL Query me!  22:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Cheers! :) That a jar of puke?Holla 22:09, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Heads up, the talkpage link never works on your own talkpage. SQL Query me!  22:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Haha, thanks. I had to revert my signature anyways, as I couldn't figure out why it wouldn't work. Cheers! Boomer VialHolla 22:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC) It actually doesn't seem to work on my talk page. I tested it on other pages, and it seemed to work. Boomer VialHolla 22:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

rollback
Hi Boomer Vial. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Katietalk 23:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * Thank you, and I will definitely keep those points in mind. Cheers! Boomer VialHolla 00:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Conchobar Lads Tomlinson
Thanks for the ping on this. I thought I should tell you that I should get no credit for moving along the deletion of this article. Since the talk page is deleted with the article, there is no way to show the previous sequence of edits. It seems Materialscientist deleted it just after I read your message and during the short time I was considering it. I had actually looked back to see the time stamp and the article was gone. Donner60 (talk) 08:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Your welcome. I know, I was hoping to have you ping a few admins for me so it could be dealt with. Materialscientist ended up deleting the page right after. Just a case of good timing, haha. :) Cheers! Boomer VialHolla 00:37, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: BethNaught (talk) 19:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Pings
I happened to notice this edit. Note that the valid ping and your signature have to be added in the same edit, or no notification occurs. The thing to do in that situation is to add a new comment with the ping, being careful to remember to sign it. Also, is a template, so it has to be enclosed in double-braces, not double-square-brackets. You have created a piped wikilink to the dab page, Ping. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  10:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, oops. Sorry about that. I guess I wasn't holding my shift button all the way down. I went back and changed it to brackets. Thanks a lot for letting me know. :) Boomer VialHolla 10:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * See the first thing I said above. You stil have not added a valid ping and your signature in the same edit. You added your signature in your opening post, all the rest was simply replacing what was already there. That's why I said the thing to do in that siutation is to add a new comment . Oh, and the user link generates the same notification as ping, so he had already got the notification with your opening post. Maybe why that's why your AIV report got such quick attention by that same admin? &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  10:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I'm not following you. Do you mean the ping, and my signature in the same edit? Boomer VialHolla 21:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

A typical scenario: Another typical scenario: After noticing either initial mistake, there are two possible ways to correct it: Finally, keep in mind that a link to the user page also generates a notification. The only difference is in the appearance on the page; ping produces a @ character, user link creates the prefix "User:". In some contexts a link makes more sense or "works better", in others a ping does, but it doesn't really matter as long as the notification gets sent. Also keep in mind that there are multiple templates that generate notifications, and various aliases (redirects) for each template, and different editors prefer different templates and aliases. This is in keeping with the Wikipedia tradition of making things as complicated as possible. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  01:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You create a new comment containing an intended ping and your signature. But you botch the coding of the ping, for example as {{ping|username]]. Since a valid ping and your signature were not added in the same edit, no notification is sent.
 * You notice your mistake and you edit your comment to fix the ping. But this edit does not add your signature, it has already been added above, so no notification is sent.
 * You create a new comment containing a good ping, but you forget to sign it. Since a valid ping and your signature were not added in the same edit, no notification is sent.
 * You notice your mistake and you edit your comment to sign it. But this edit does not add the ping, it has already been added above, so no notification is sent.
 * Self-revert. View the diff and copy your comment text. Create a new comment, pasting in the text and then correcting your mistake. -or-
 * Add a new comment below the existing one, including a valid ping, your signature, and the statement that you are retrying a botched ping.
 * What's really odd is when I view the page, my post and the ping to Materialscientist are unmalformed (meaning, when I look at it, Materialscientist has a @ before his name). Well, I understand what you were trying to say now. I need to either strikeout the post in question, and re-post it, or copy/paste it. Thanks for the clarification. Boomer VialHolla 06:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Why you reverted my edition in Indigenous rights?
Why you reverted my edition in Indigenous rights? But in the 1950s the indigenous of New World countries wasn't made protest movement for indigenous rights, they accept the "acculturation" and the "colonial mentality", they accept as people. Before 1960s cultural changes, the Western world was in the conservative culture and wasn't rooted and steeped in Marxist cultural and Radical environment ideologies countercultures. - 201.81.64.163 (talk) 06:46, 28 January 2016 (UTC).
 * I reverted your edits, because accidentally erased 3,000 bytes of data from the page when you added your contribution. You can re-add it if you like, just please be careful about erasing large portions of texts. It's more likely to catch the eye of vandalism-fighters, such as myself. Thanks. Boomer VialHolla 06:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * But my edition wasn't a vandalism, it was a remotion of tendentious content of Marxist cultural and environmentalist radical connotation and put the true about the indigenous rights. the Wikipedia aren't place of Marxist cultural and environmentalist radical connotation. - 201.81.64.163 (talk) 20:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC).
 * You misunderstand me, . You did not leave an edit summary after blanking 3k bytes worth of text. Also, please read WP:NPOV, and WP:CON before removing such a large portion of referenced text. Also, please read WP:TEND before you throw the word around. That's exactly what your edit here was. Boomer VialHolla 21:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

 * WP:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive305
 * WP:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive305

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.17.137.178 (talk • contribs)
 * Though this complaint was closed with protection of the article, the IP editor has complained that I didn't issue a warning to you, in a statement at User talk:EdJohnston. It appears that the IP did explain deletion of the material in their edit summaries. Though the user is not a paragon of diplomacy ("Stupid messages") they say they know about astronomy. It is unclear why you believed they were violating WP:NPOV. You are welcome to reply on my talk page if you want to. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Maybe I was mistaken. I just didn't understand this edit with the edit summary "none of this tells us anything about fliers". The section could have been trimmed by the IP editor so the lines about FLIERs and the Saturn Nebula stood out more. Again, I could be wrong, and if so, I apologize to the user. Boomer VialHolla 21:41, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * User: 82.151.49.225 Sorry about that last revert on your talk page. The page jumped when I clicked. Boomer VialHolla 22:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Best to disengage, reverting doesn't help anybody.  Acroterion   (talk)   22:34, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Understood. It was an accidental revert, but I'm dropping the stick now. Thanks, User:Acroterion. Boomer VialHolla 22:35, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Welcome messages
A tip for welcoming new users: Only post welcome messages to those who have already made contributions. —General534 (talk)
 * Oh, well, no harm done. Thanks for the tip, though! :D Cheers! Boomer VialHolla 00:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with giving people cookies, but sending welcome messages to actual contributors speeds up the process (and makes sure those who are serious about contributing get the right message). —General534 (talk)
 * Ok, I'll keep that in mind. Again, thanks! :) Boomer VialHolla 00:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Help with User:Symplectic Map/AutoSpell
Hi there. I was just wondering how I access my monobook.js? I'm trying to add this spell checker to my tools, and I have no idea how to do the first step. Boomer VialHolla 07:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * These are just files that can be edited like any other. First, check in "Preferences" which "skin" you are using. The default nowadays is Vector, in which case you would need to create User:Boomer Vial/vector.js and add to it the line described in User:Symplectic Map/AutoSpell. If something goes wrong and you want to delete the file, you can put  at the top. The U1 template does not display in the usual way, but it does put the file in the speedy-deletion queue. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * . Hi Boomer Vial. I would recommend putting it in your User:Boomer Vial/common.js file so then it will be available to any Wikipedia skin including monobook, vector, etc. Click on the red link above to create your common.js file.


 * I also like to put a label above any scripts I install so I can tell what the script is. You can label a section by surrounding it with forward slashes and asterisks like this:


 * /* Label goes here between the two asterisks and the two forward slashes */


 * You can look at my User:Checkingfax/common.js file if you need an example of using labels. Be sure to  your common.js file after saving the changes you make. Cheers!  01:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Boomer Vial: I just fixed a couple of typos in my post above. Cheers!  14:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

67.100.127.76 (talk) 11:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Why are you involved of monitoring me what I edit? Why are you doing this to me? I like to create anything I want for Sandbox.
 * Again, Wikipedia is not here so you can create whatever you want. It is here as a informational encyclopedia that can be contributed too. Boomer VialHolla 11:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * IP is presently blocked for disruptive editing. SQL Query me!  14:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

You helped me out
Hi Boomer, you tried to help on a Clemson football page the other day, and were fair enough to make necessary corrections. I just checked the page and the same old sockpuppeteer (129.252.69.40 / GarnetAndBlack)   is back who has been banned in the past for pushing the same overly excessive negative content to the same section of the page. Could you revert it back to your last edit, file a dispute, or try to get the page locked or secured to the way you had it. I won't log on due to his user watching, and don't have time right now, but can take a look at it tomorrow perhaps. Thanks for your help again! 2602:306:25EB:FD39:45DA:8DDE:2C53:F1BC (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * First of all, User:GarnetAndBlack is far from a vandal. Secondly, the edits that you have been reverting were approved per WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page for Clemson Tigers football. So please stop reverting the edits on that article. Thanks. Boomer VialHolla 14:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2016
Hello,

"I" originally created the 2012 version of the Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election wiki page (one of my 1st attempts at an article), following those local elections (I was also a candidate ! and the only computer-expert in the local association).

"I" have since, created the 2013, 2014 & 2015 pages (and improved upon each/I hope).

"I" was looking to create an "empty template", based on the lastest 2015-stylee of the page, but with the 2012-ish content ... as over the four-year local-council election cycle means that DIFFERENT wards come up for election, from year to year.

today, I created an "empty/2015-style" ALTHAM WARD and copied it, umpteen times, one for each of the 12-wards up for election this year (but I think I copied it 13-times ... by accident) - then I went into each, the 'echo' the last-4-yrs-ago party-winner with a "T.B.C." entry in-place of the previous incumbent winner/ ahead of the actual "yet to be picked/confirmed" names, accordingly.

Last year, was also a General Election, so we had various Green Party/UKIP/ Liberal and Independants ... but I left off "blank/empty" template lines for them, for the time being.

I hope this helps to clarify.

I did try looking for any "How to make a (similar) wiki page, based on an existing wiki-page" option, but there didn't see to be one.

I used the ref-link at the bottom of the "Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2015" page, which "SHOWS" each of the years, and spotted a RED "2016" which automatically lead to the "create a new page ..." and I followed my nose, from theronin - was that the wrong approach to use ?


 * Currently, as a result of the 'BOT's intervention, this Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2016 "is" still a carbon copy of the Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election,_2015 page, WITHOUT the 2016-specific/blank place holders (plus that one extr 13th/copy-of-empty-altham-ward) entry - will "they" be swapped back/soon ???

Regards WarrenM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrenlm (talk • contribs) 15:58, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. My apologies about reverting your revision. Boomer VialHolla 16:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * BOOMER - Should I put the kettle on, while we wait - it seems to be taking a while to "revert" / i've been hitting F5/Refresh but still only seeing the 4yr-old names of winners+candidates instead of "TBC" reference-placeholders .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrenlm (talk • contribs) 16:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, haha. Well, would you like me to revert it for you? Boomer VialHolla 16:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I "think" I just did, via the HISTORY option, I clicked on UNDO your thingy ... but it still has the 'BOT warnoing msg - can YOU get rid of that ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrenlm (talk • contribs)
 * I'm not following you. Do you mean the message on your talk page? Also, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~). Boomer VialHolla 16:24, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Re TVOntario
I have undone your revert because I fail to see how my edit was not constructive. The changes were: correcting the CICA call sign ("CICA-TV" to "CICA-DT") and clarifying the names of the companies that TVO entered into carriage agreements with. 64.231.40.53 (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about that. I'm still getting used to trying to cipher good-faith contributions from vandalism with Huggle,and using Huggle while it is peak vandal times. You're right though, and I apologize for my blind revert of your edit. Boomer VialHolla 01:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Help with MiszaBot
Hey there, fellow editor. I was just tinkering with the settings for the archive bot on this talk page, and I was wondering why older conversations on my talk page were not archived when I changed it here. Thanks. Boomer VialHolla 00:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You only made that change a short while ago. The archive bots only check through pages a few times a day. Please be patient, the fix should take effect within the next 24 hours. Primefac (talk) 01:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. :) Boomer VialHolla 03:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)