User talk:Booncehead

Nomination of Boulder Creek (Queensland) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boulder Creek (Queensland) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Boulder Creek (Queensland) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 10:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Your creations
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your creations. However, you should put refs and images in your creations. They are in danger of being deleted. Take a look at WP:42. Thank you.—Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 10:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, images are optional. But references are needed, and also please remember to give us some context - where are "Calen" and "Marian" in your Boulder Creek (Queensland) article? It's an international encyclopedia, and you need to specify the country and, preferably, give a bit more of a clue too. Same applies to your newly-created Red Hill Mine. Please remember to link to other articles, and if the link for an important topic is red it's worth looking around to try to find the article at a slightly different title, such as Eureka Stockade without the "The"! I'll clean that one up a bit now: the Boulder Creek article seems unlikely to survive unless you can produce some references which show it to be WP:NOTABLE. There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia but it's an interesting journey. Enjoy your editing. Pam  D  15:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)